Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5071304 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:59:21 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ih17so842640qab.19 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=HVBN6fjbWzF+DnK2A7vJMKOnPOP9Cuuw7eO1PjHkSp4=; b=YbuamX9f8agaJYyZuAeXI32Kymn7ZjGG1iKJQJZccJHRUpHP+HHC4Oq/x1K7tcX7A9 6th4i8p/+WsrO33zhQYrw2mntLAWO0UKSTxUIziTRzgQDBTqaD4U2axym1GdohPsx5NH qrLvPWTBsV7Py9m5MmiSouG+VUI+KwjhCn+DanYldL0L0tVZFfuwr2Kpn5y589+plHzm ed8oKJLtBqNhvjt7iXxqt2+xzmO0KQA+G/Ic/qeaRj+XNzdj7LuC4cQMuYhs/Fdt/M0E E+OfTsldqPliPRHCuW4AvHy/bgryJvlInn0iXXs4+iC2ye237SkFQxV8lUXHtS9ntbxW 4dEw== X-Received: by 10.229.123.30 with SMTP id n30mr4282256qcr.104.1368583700364; Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.95.234 with HTTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 19:07:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 22:07:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175738a44e478d04dcb8392c --0015175738a44e478d04dcb8392c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just got a GTX Titan and wanted to post my numbers. I had a very interesting experience overclocking the titan. It does not behave like any other card. The card itself decides most variables. I needed to have GPU-Z open to figure out what was going on; initially, when overclocking, I was getting SLOWER renders than at "stock speed." this is because the hardware manages boost largely by itself at "stock" and actually does quite a good job at it. You need to tweak very specifically to get a stable OC. If anyone wants to know more I'd be happy to share. But so far, I'm very impressed with the Titan's performance in AE, c4d and maya. Especially when factoring in a) it is a single-gpu solution b) 6GB RAM more than any consumer card and c) low power and heat for its class. intel 3930K @ 4.6 ghz, with Titan @ stock speed =3D 3:57 intel 3930K @ 4.6 ghz, with Titan OC @ 1110 mhz base clock =3D 3:40 doesn't seem like much, but it's actually quite a boost when considering longer renders. I will be testing this against a 2x GTX 580 in SLI, but still waiting on my second card for my second workstation. right now GTX 580 3GB I am getting 5 min 5 sec with GPU clock at 925 mhz, or 5:45 at stock speed. testbed is intel 3770k @ 4.7 ghz On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH < rodrigo.olmos@animares.com> wrote: > You are welcome ;-)**** > > ** ** > > -rodrigo**** > > ** ** > > .**** > > ** ** > > *From**:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] *On > Behalf Of *rendernyc > *Sent**:* Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:21 > > *To:* After Effects Mail List > *Subject**:* Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan > raytracing benchmarks**** > > ** ** > > cool, thanks for the info, I added it to the charts as well @ > http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH < > rodrigo.olmos@animares.com> wrote:**** > > I have following results:**** > > **** > > *robot4JS.aep:* Time 00:10:44**** > > 2x X5550 @ 2.67ghz, 48GB RAM, GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores**** > > **** > > **** > > *CS6 11.1 RAYTRACE BENCHMARK.aep:* Time:00:04:16 (new try)**** > > 2x X5550 @ 2.67ghz, 48GB RAM, GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores**** > > **** > > **** > > -rodrigo**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > * ***** > > **** > > **** > > I have to post the file on my site still but here's a link **** > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/b0ixxyqths6eqdn/robot4JS.aep**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > > On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:11 AM, "Jim Tierney" wrote= : > **** > > Ah. So many little hidden files...**** > > **** > > Thanks, that solved it. Results:**** > > **** > > i7-3770@3.4ghz, 8gb RAM, GTX Titan- Time: 00:04:01**** > > **** > > I'll post times for 690, 570, and Q4000 tomorrow.**** > > **** > > **** > > Cheers,**** > > Jim**** > > --------------- **** > > Jim Tierney**** > > President**** > > Digital Anarchy**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] > *On Behalf Of *Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:53 AM > *To:* After Effects Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan > raytracing benchmarks**** > > **** > > Hi Jim,**** > > **** > > first you have to copy the file 'raytracer_supported_cards.txt' on to the > desktop.**** > > **** > > Then type this in the list of supported cards:**** > > GeForce GTX TITAN**** > > **** > > Save and copy that file back into the 'Support Files' folder.**** > > **** > > My titan works fine on CS6 / Win7.**** > > **** > > - rodrigo**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] > *On Behalf Of *Jim Tierney > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2013 07:37 > *To:* After Effects Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan > raytracing benchmarks**** > > **** > > Did you have any trouble getting AE to recognize the Titan? I'm just > getting 'incompatible device or driver'. :-\ (running Windows 8... w= hich > I don't recommend upgrading to)**** > > **** > > Drivers are updated, Premiere seems to recognize it (I listed it the > supported_cards file), but AE is showing CUDA grayed out and won't use th= e > GPU. Not sure what's up. Any thoughts would be appreciated.**** > > **** > > **** > > Cheers,**** > > Jim**** > > --------------- **** > > Jim Tierney**** > > President**** > > Digital Anarchy**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] > *On Behalf Of *Teddy Gage > *Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2013 1:19 PM > *To:* After Effects Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan > raytracing benchmarks**** > > **** > > my project is available here > http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ > > but obviously the results are different than Dan's bench**** > > **** > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich Young wrote:**= * > * > > Can we get the project to test ourselves? > > Rich > > > --- On *Mon, 4/22/13, rendernyc * wrote:**** > > > From: rendernyc > Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan > raytracing benchmarks > To: "After Effects Mail List" > Date: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM**** > > i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680.**** > > results are here**** > > http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo > > wrote:**** > > I would be curious about the results of the new iMacs mx680 card... Can > amybod post a reszlt with that card?**** > > **** > > Thanks**** > > Gary > > Az iPhone k=E9sz=FCl=E9kemr=F5l k=FCldve**** > > > 2013.04.21. d=E1tummal, 22:40 id=F5pontban Teddy Gage > > =EDrta:**** > > So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow > that has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable > spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performanc= e > of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I > wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in > fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The > results were very interesting. The original thread is here > > http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979**** > > And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at > > http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ > **** > > **** > > What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / > 6000) or any tesla card.**** > > Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about > their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport = 3D > (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)**** > > The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last yea= r > and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. > viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using = a > poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance > in the 6xx consumer cards.**** > > Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from > saying what I think until people get a chance to check it out.**** > > -TG**** > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn**** > > > > **** > > **** > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com **** > > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com **** > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --0015175738a44e478d04dcb8392c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I just got a GTX Titan and wanted to post my numbers. I ha= d a very interesting experience overclocking the titan. It does not behave = like any other card. The card itself decides most variables. I needed to ha= ve GPU-Z open to figure out what was going on; initially, when overclocking= , I was getting SLOWER renders than at "stock speed." this is bec= ause the hardware manages boost largely by itself at "stock" and = actually does quite a good job at it. You need to tweak very specifically t= o get a stable OC. If anyone wants to know more I'd be happy to share. = But so far, I'm very impressed with the Titan's performance in AE, = c4d and maya. Especially when factoring in a) it is a single-gpu solution b= ) 6GB RAM more than any consumer card and c) low power and heat for its cla= ss.

intel 3930K @ 4.6 ghz, with Titan @ stock speed =3D 3:57
intel 3930K @ 4.6 ghz, with Titan OC @ 1110 mhz base clock =3D 3:40

doesn't seem like much, but it's actually quite a boost when co= nsidering longer renders.
I will be testing this against a 2x GTX 580 in SLI, but still waiting on my= second card for my second workstation.

right now

GTX 580 3GB I am getting 5 min 5 sec with GPU clock at 925 mhz, or 5:45 at stock speed.= testbed is intel 3770k @ 4.7 ghz


<= div class=3D"gmail_quote"> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH <rodrigo.olmos@animares.com> wrote:

You are welcome ;-)<= /u>

 

-rodrigo<= /p>

 

.

 

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of rendernyc
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:21


To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchma= rks

 

cool, thanks for the info, I added it to the charts = as well @ http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/

 

 

 

 <= /p>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Rodrigo Olmos | AN= IMA RES GmbH <rodrigo.olmos@animares.com> wrote:

I have followin= g results:

 

robot4JS.aep= : Time 00:10:44

2x X5550 @ 2.67= ghz, 48GB RAM, GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores

 

 

CS6 11.1 RAY= TRACE BENCHMARK.aep: Time:00:04:16 (new try)

2x X5550 @ 2.67= ghz, 48GB RAM, GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores

 

 

-rodrigo=

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have to post the file on my site still but here= 9;s a link 

 


On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:11 AM, "Jim Tierney" <jim@digitalanarchy.com> wr= ote:

Ah. So many little hidden= files…

 

Thanks, that solved it. R= esults:

 

i7-3770@3.4ghz, 8gb RAM, GTX Titan- &nb= sp;  Time: 00:04:01

 

I’ll post times for= 690, 570, and Q4000 tomorrow.

 

 

Cheers,<= /u>

Jim<= /p>

--------------- 

Jim Tierney=

President

Digital Anarchy=

 

 

 

From: After Ef= fects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:53 AM
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan ray= tracing benchmarks

 

Hi Jim,

 

first you have to copy the fil= e ‘raytracer_supported_cards.txt’ on to the desktop.<= /u>

 

Then type this in the list of = supported cards:

GeForce GTX TITAN

 

Save and copy that file back i= nto the ‘Support Files’ folder.

 

My titan works fine on CS6 / W= in7.

 

- rodrigo=

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

 

From: After Ef= fects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Jim Tierney
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 07:37
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan ray= tracing benchmarks

 

Did you have any trouble = getting AE to recognize the Titan? I’m just getting ‘incompatib= le device or driver’.   :-\    (running Windows 8&hel= lip; which I don’t recommend upgrading to)

 

Drivers are updated, Prem= iere seems to recognize it (I listed it the supported_cards file), but AE is showing CUDA grayed out and won’t use the GPU. Not sure what&rsqu= o;s up. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

 

 

Cheers,<= /u>

Jim<= /p>

--------------- 

Jim Tierney=

President

Digital Anarchy=

 

 

 

From: After Ef= fects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Teddy Gage
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:19 PM
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan ray= tracing benchmarks

 

my project is available here
http://w= ww.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

but obviously the results are different than Dan's bench<= /p>

 <= /p>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich Young <aefilter@yahoo.com&= gt; wrote:

Can we get the project to test ourselves?

Rich


--- On Mon, 4/22/13, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:=


From: rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Date: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM

i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680= .

results are here

 

 

 <= /p>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo <fo= rmic.gergo@gmail.com> wrote:

I would be curious about the results of the new iMac= s mx680 card... Can amybod post a reszlt with that card?

 

Thanks

Gary

Az iPhone k=E9sz=FCl=E9kemr=F5l k=FCldve


2013.04.21. d=E1tummal, 22:40 id=F5pontban Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com= > =EDrta:

So a while ago I post= ed an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that has gotten a lot of re= sponses, so I threw together a quick, readable spreadsheet of the results. = I was mainly curious about compute performance of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx c= ards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was worth the = extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 te= sla which costs over $3k. The results were very interesting. The original thread is here

http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979

And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark fi= le) on my server at

http://w= ww.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

 

What I would love to = add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.=

Furthermore I'd b= e interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about their experiences usi= ng an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya= / or C4D especially)

The amount of C4D wor= k I've been doing has only increased in the last year and I can imagine= when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. viewport accuracy is= going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros b= y gimping compute performance in the 6xx consumer cards.

Would also love to hear any thoughts on these result= s, I'll refrain from saying what I think until people get a chance to c= heck it out.

-TG



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



 

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com =




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



 

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com =




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--0015175738a44e478d04dcb8392c--