Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5082104 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:23:04 +0200 Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id xn12so1205013obc.20 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5k4110g7bPv3td/GaIrjcMaTKOIw+mo2pzCVG+NT5Bg=; b=g+oZqaJjq3h6TEU9cl9LsjvM1BcWUA6UY7rK9bKXq5dRwkxTt16/Cz5JcWpzbwr/ps t+Jpu8Dj0IGf4wNMT0pk6Uo40Kj/6O4BE+cB9H+OLGbLTtvDo4AF8SykeiVDIgEppugP DWO3llMowMuQlAfXlt4RlpXW2QkrAlev7Kh4z7LrxpL5/VoNZaFFnH3BAjwLNTy2cPOl Mo/tVnBFx2WPLGIrua7auKK6DgxU85py4mHJjFHQngfRp60ZivAArs8Kcj+lCDbsdKQo gyTzabdV/AC4ItpbTnedl6Mr/JeQcaN9fxeJcQsnndDJ6r+iZx3YQEjW0VYoisTxEgul xw5A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.153.5 with SMTP id vc5mr9574116obb.32.1369337539875; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.173.136 with HTTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:32:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a0adaa4597804dd67bd25 --089e013a0adaa4597804dd67bd25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 is that the same system that you ran the 680 in? i7 3820@3.6 On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > also, @Danny aka rendernyc I ran your robot bench on both an OC titan @ > 1120 mhz and an OC sli GTX 580 x2 @ 860mhz > > titan results were here, last render item http://i.imgur.com/royBZpj.jpg > > 8 min 12 sec > > sli 580 GTX x2 rendered in 9 min 12 sec > > which is interesting because in the other benchmarks the gtx 580x2 was > faster > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > >> With double-precision on, the benchmark renders slower. Just tried it. >> not by much, maybe 5-10%? Honestly I have no idea what double-precision is >> useful for. Anyone can fill me in? >> >> I was also wondering whether it was possible to edit a preferences file >> allowing AE to use more available VRAM. I understand limiting cards with >> less memory, but I'm only getting 4.5 GB of usable VRAM with the titan in >> AE. Granted, that is a lot but it would be great to get another GB and I >> doubt the OS needs more than 500 mb of overhead. >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Darby Edelen wrote: >> >>> I'd be curious to find out how Titan performs in these tests with double >>> precision enabled vs. disabled from the nvidia control panel. I expect >>> that the ray-traced renderer in AE is probably not double precision but I'd >>> like to find out :) >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>> >>>> So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow >>>> that has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable >>>> spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance >>>> of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I >>>> wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in >>>> fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The >>>> results were very interesting. The original thread is here >>>> >>>> http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979 >>>> >>>> And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at >>>> >>>> http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ >>>> >>>> What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / >>>> 6000) or any tesla card. >>>> >>>> Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about >>>> their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D >>>> (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially) >>>> >>>> The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last >>>> year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. >>>> viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a >>>> poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance >>>> in the 6xx consumer cards. >>>> >>>> Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain >>>> from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it out. >>>> -TG >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Animator & Editor >>>> www.teddygage.com >>>> Brooklyn >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Animator & Editor >> www.teddygage.com >> Brooklyn >> > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > -- danny princz vimeo.com/rendernyc --089e013a0adaa4597804dd67bd25 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
is that the same system that you ran the 680 in?

<= /div>
i7 3820@3.6


<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Teddy Gage <t= eddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
also, @= Danny aka rendernyc I ran your robot bench on both an OC titan @ 1120 mhz a= nd an OC sli GTX 580 x2 @ 860mhz

titan results were here, last render item http://i.imgur.com/royBZpj.jpg
8 min 12 sec

sli 580 GTX x2 rendered in 9 min 12 sec=

which is interesting because in the other benchmarks the gtx = 580x2 was faster


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
With double-precision on, the benchmark ren= ders slower. Just tried it. not by much, maybe 5-10%? Honestly I have no id= ea what double-precision is useful for. Anyone can fill me in?

I was also wondering whether it was possible to edit a preference= s file allowing AE to use more available VRAM. I understand limiting cards = with less memory, but I'm only getting 4.5 GB of usable VRAM with the t= itan in AE. Granted, that is a lot but it would be great to get another GB = and I doubt the OS needs more than 500 mb of overhead.


On Mon,= Apr 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Darby Edelen <dedelen@gmail.com> = wrote:
I'd be curious to find = out how Titan performs in these tests with double precision enabled vs. dis= abled from the nvidia control panel.=A0 I expect that the ray-traced render= er in AE is probably not double precision but I'd like to find out :)


On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
So a while ago I poste= d an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that has gotten a lot of res= ponses, so I threw together a quick, readable spreadsheet of the results. I= was mainly curious about compute performance of the new titan card vs. las= t gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was= worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer version of the nv= idia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results were very interesting. The= original thread is here

http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979
And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my se= rver at

http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

What I would love to add are any results with the newer qu= adros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.

Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from = 3D users about their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card = for viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the l= ast year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to incr= ease. viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is us= ing a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute perform= ance in the 6xx consumer cards.

Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'= ;ll refrain from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it = out.
-TG


--
A= nimator & Editor
www.teddygage.= com
Brooklyn




--
Anima= tor & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



--
= --089e013a0adaa4597804dd67bd25--