Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5082113 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:37:26 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bs12so1858421qab.19 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:46:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=V8wngdiFFuw4J2AwYpHNtDE6GUHUmcH9fLTZ0tBNWQk=; b=VJ5zBxoyQa2wlNGSv/KgrJQUZSEdMXJyy4NzdSQyTLrtU1/iJKvdYlH3x9brCg964d KZILM8vbQJCd6HkuDoZKVrUMQJ0mdo1sMTjuooi2pfw9chgvXmOStFJGzZs3xG2DgZQd YyxDsyf3OEK+gl5Whtg/9r9IfKQ78VchlNFTTMeCHNHP4shwuthTrIqs+yRw/zBdHzSo mz8kT9d/y+UZsn5QF4Js1OGQKE0S3CT7li32tOlgD8C7EXnlthR8vHSiX5SuL9AlUEU/ NNDrfNNT2TgTLCh5EOk2fRPay5+wYq99mYRgv4AkkeAB9cylQiwfDa/N57GIwI2ft7l7 SO/Q== X-Received: by 10.49.24.198 with SMTP id w6mr14788597qef.58.1369338402230; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:46:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.88.102 with HTTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:46:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:46:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d8e790c838204dd67f106 --047d7b5d8e790c838204dd67f106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 oh and the gtx 580s are the 3GB edition, one zotac, one asus. seem to work fine together On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > The titan is in the machine with a 3930K @ 4.6 ghz, 32 gb ram, asus p9 mobo > > The sli GTX 580 is in a new machine with an MSI board, the quad core > 3770K, 16 gb 2133 mhz RAM and 128gb RAID 0 SSD drives. > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:32 PM, rendernyc wrote: > >> is that the same system that you ran the 680 in? >> >> i7 3820@3.6 >> >> >> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >> >>> also, @Danny aka rendernyc I ran your robot bench on both an OC titan @ >>> 1120 mhz and an OC sli GTX 580 x2 @ 860mhz >>> >>> titan results were here, last render item http://i.imgur.com/royBZpj.jpg >>> >>> 8 min 12 sec >>> >>> sli 580 GTX x2 rendered in 9 min 12 sec >>> >>> which is interesting because in the other benchmarks the gtx 580x2 was >>> faster >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>> >>>> With double-precision on, the benchmark renders slower. Just tried it. >>>> not by much, maybe 5-10%? Honestly I have no idea what double-precision is >>>> useful for. Anyone can fill me in? >>>> >>>> I was also wondering whether it was possible to edit a preferences file >>>> allowing AE to use more available VRAM. I understand limiting cards with >>>> less memory, but I'm only getting 4.5 GB of usable VRAM with the titan in >>>> AE. Granted, that is a lot but it would be great to get another GB and I >>>> doubt the OS needs more than 500 mb of overhead. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Darby Edelen wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd be curious to find out how Titan performs in these tests with >>>>> double precision enabled vs. disabled from the nvidia control panel. I >>>>> expect that the ray-traced renderer in AE is probably not double precision >>>>> but I'd like to find out :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow >>>>>> that has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable >>>>>> spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance >>>>>> of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I >>>>>> wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in >>>>>> fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The >>>>>> results were very interesting. The original thread is here >>>>>> >>>>>> http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979 >>>>>> >>>>>> And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server >>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ >>>>>> >>>>>> What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 >>>>>> / 6000) or any tesla card. >>>>>> >>>>>> Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users >>>>>> about their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for >>>>>> viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially) >>>>>> >>>>>> The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last >>>>>> year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. >>>>>> viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a >>>>>> poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance >>>>>> in the 6xx consumer cards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain >>>>>> from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it out. >>>>>> -TG >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Animator & Editor >>>>>> www.teddygage.com >>>>>> Brooklyn >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Animator & Editor >>>> www.teddygage.com >>>> Brooklyn >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Animator & Editor >>> www.teddygage.com >>> Brooklyn >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> vimeo.com/rendernyc >> > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7b5d8e790c838204dd67f106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
oh and the gtx 580s are the 3GB edition, one zotac, one as= us. seem to work fine together


=
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Teddy Gage <= teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
The titan is in the machine with a 3930K @ 4.6 ghz, 32 gb= ram, asus p9 mobo

The sli GTX 580 is in a new machine with an MSI board, the quad c= ore 3770K, 16 gb 2133 mhz RAM and 128gb RAID 0 SSD drives.


On Thu,= May 23, 2013 at 3:32 PM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> = wrote:
is that the same system tha= t you ran the 680 in?

i7 3820@3.6


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:17 P= M, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
also, @= Danny aka rendernyc I ran your robot bench on both an OC titan @ 1120 mhz a= nd an OC sli GTX 580 x2 @ 860mhz

titan results were here, last render item http://i.imgur.com/royBZpj.jpg
8 min 12 sec

sli 580 GTX x2 rendered in 9 min 12 sec=

which is interesting because in the other benchmarks the gtx = 580x2 was faster


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
With double-precision on, the benchmark ren= ders slower. Just tried it. not by much, maybe 5-10%? Honestly I have no id= ea what double-precision is useful for. Anyone can fill me in?

I was also wondering whether it was possible to edit a preference= s file allowing AE to use more available VRAM. I understand limiting cards = with less memory, but I'm only getting 4.5 GB of usable VRAM with the t= itan in AE. Granted, that is a lot but it would be great to get another GB = and I doubt the OS needs more than 500 mb of overhead.


On Mon,= Apr 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Darby Edelen <dedelen@gmail.com> = wrote:
I'd be curious to find = out how Titan performs in these tests with double precision enabled vs. dis= abled from the nvidia control panel.=A0 I expect that the ray-traced render= er in AE is probably not double precision but I'd like to find out :)


On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
So a while ago I poste= d an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that has gotten a lot of res= ponses, so I threw together a quick, readable spreadsheet of the results. I= was mainly curious about compute performance of the new titan card vs. las= t gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was= worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer version of the nv= idia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results were very interesting. The= original thread is here

http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979
And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my se= rver at

http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

What I would love to add are any results with the newer qu= adros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.

Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from = 3D users about their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card = for viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the l= ast year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to incr= ease. viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is us= ing a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute perform= ance in the 6xx consumer cards.

Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'= ;ll refrain from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it = out.
-TG


--
A= nimator & Editor
www.teddygage.= com
Brooklyn




--
Anima= tor & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



--
Anima= tor & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



<= /div>--
danny princz
=
vimeo.com/rend= ernyc



--
Animator &a= mp; Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--047d7b5d8e790c838204dd67f106--