Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv ? Message #49206
From: Stephen van Vuuren <stephen@sv2studios.com>
Subject: RE: [AE] Render Farm
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:43:00 -0400
To: 'After Effects Mail List' <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
signature1

> I have to disagree here. Image sequences suck for time critical renders in my case.

 

I will agree and disagree – it depends on a lot of factors. Lost time due to QT render failing if the renders are long (I routinely have 3 to 5 day renders) means I always use image sequences and compile to image sequences and store as image sequences.

 

But if you have short renders that almost never barf – QT only workflow can make sense on a small render farm (mine is 2-4 machines).

 

Disk and LAN speed is also a factor as well as which QT codec you use – speed varies considerably there. It’s sounds like in your world “an hour” is a really long time. In my world “an hour” is an average single frame render speed J

 

stephen van vuuren

336.202.4777

 

http://www.insaturnsrings.com/

http://www.sv2dcp.com/

http://www.sv2studios.com/

 

A film is – or should be – more like music than like fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what’s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.

–Stanley Kubrick

 

 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster