Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5089059 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 30 May 2013 19:23:13 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n20so1168525qaj.20 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Mt56ytvlSOsTF0ziRtgv/hHaoPwA1ZyulTbuPExYxVE=; b=VGKNisx/NwkzETwTwd2O0k31ox/PbkhD6+jAojHggjmxqVfMB2YoiZfoASJVAmSn3m 41xGOxknQ0XAiEdYeGUlccCkkgAmP5u6iTI1I9BFzI8vyv1k94ga2Sh0gWJynE0Xvu1F mmTq/Ykq+qLhZpD0wqjbFhLAjqdqQs0jRzWjcVCvFmxrhhegp4hTBjZpThYk0IO4aMXH lG6ouvEj9Nwv78f2X5cHuwgOyLCULOlVMobzZMRrXhTLhN9sGDDzD8MLUMEDa0B65Go4 LwO6KBXM3HYwzke1rgtQwFdAHq1vFfG5iE1jazQb4PC1qxvBu/sHHU2Q33IPkn1hXZKh bTAw== X-Received: by 10.49.0.145 with SMTP id 17mr7855158qee.26.1369935162925; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:32:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.121.168 with HTTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:32:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:32:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Multi-GPU benchmarks To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d892c0846704ddf2e20e --047d7b33d892c0846704ddf2e20e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 yeah, interesting, if not exactly comprehensive, only testing four setups with two different cards. And I have found not all benchmarks have the same results. I have a similar thing going on creative cow forums. http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120 I'll have to look into this octane render engine thing though. Hadn't heard of that. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rendernyc wrote: > Looks like they are using my benchmark file. > > You can see more results here as well as download the file at > > Loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA > > On May 30, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Jeff Handy wrote: > > > Today, Barefeats posted some benchmarks for some dual GPU configs. The > results with the AE-specific tests are quite interesting. Of course, these > are Mac-centric tests, but telling nonetheless. > > > > http://www.barefeats.com/gpu680v5.html > > > > > > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7b33d892c0846704ddf2e20e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yeah, interesting, if not exactly comprehensive, only test= ing four setups with two different cards. And I have found not all benchmar= ks have the same results. I have a similar thing going on creative cow foru= ms. http://forum= s.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120 I'll have to look into this octa= ne render engine thing though. Hadn't heard of that.


On Thu,= May 30, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> = wrote:
Looks like they are using my benchmark file.=

You can see more results here as well as download the file at

Loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA

On May 30, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Jeff Handy <jeff.handy@icloud.com> wrote:

> Today, Barefeats posted some benchmarks for some dual GPU configs. The= results with the AE-specific tests are quite interesting. Of course, these= are Mac-centric tests, but telling nonetheless.
>
> h= ttp://www.barefeats.com/gpu680v5.html
>
>
>

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--047d7b33d892c0846704ddf2e20e--