Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5097731 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:41:49 +0200 Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r16so2962675ead.13 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=MMzAqihBuoofpAzM7VJTa/fNrV3k/DFePhOqkUQamYg=; b=vtI+tTRYnILf4weaQNppdwuNrYKrmpWtgnnDRwZBb1o7mNyItq4jqQivpw/Qy+NbRA 964EHgWpeyxNrEN/AeOrL7QBxEFPxSywTOq/yISykbVCeSLUmgWLyFWoc392+dsJWQZf bAR7YKyJBB0gIl2+xecHZ0RleR39I24Yp9cmi+Qd6P33IDV05Fc6AkDUFkq+71gaYaFS fHho0cAGDGx5guQ/NcIQXjKdQujUOwgJKawgbb39zKaxJAr+jkZIIKRqS9tDCoyV1Uct TJ/JlAWJ3N5tfVgYMOdpE4uXv8BnlzZym2z34bt+Wnny+JlLAtTOyIoE52mIXkTHXeCK n6gQ== X-Received: by 10.14.176.66 with SMTP id a42mr25336302eem.150.1370544693197; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:51:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.129.7 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jayse Hansen Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:51:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] 3D shape layer not as crisp as 2D version To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6222d096705204de80cd83 --047d7b6222d096705204de80cd83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 really sucks for screen design - where things are supposed to be pixel perfect. In fact exporting to layered psd and importing that keeps everything sharp. Why it can't keep the ai files sharp is beyond me, but it sucks. -------------------------------- Jayse Hansen www.jayse.tv jayse@jayse.tv 702-321-3449 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > OK thanks, I guess I'm just now noticing it. Kind of a bummer if you are > after super crisp animation. > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Robert Kjettrup wrote: > >> Hi >> >> As far as i remember, this has always been the case with 3d in AE and >> vector layers... :-( >> >> - Robert >> >> >> Robert Kjettrup / Grafiker / STV Mayday >> Mobil: 25 18 95 16 >> Mail: robert@stvmayday.dk >> >> >> 2013/6/6 Byron Nash >> >>> I just noticed that when I make a layer 3D it becomes softer on the >>> edges. I'm dealing with a shape layer in this case and was comparing it to >>> the Illustrator layer I created it from. Even though the layer doesn't >>> really move in space when I enable and disable 3D it gets just a touch >>> softer. I don't have DOF enabled for my camera. Has this always happened? >>> >> >> > --047d7b6222d096705204de80cd83 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
really sucks for screen design - where things are supposed= to be pixel perfect. In fact exporting to layered psd and importing that k= eeps everything sharp. Why it can't keep the ai files sharp is beyond m= e, but it sucks.=A0


-----------------= ---------------
Jayse= Hansen
702-321-3449


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Byron Na= sh <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
OK thanks, I guess I'm just now noticing it. Kind of a= bummer if you are after super crisp animation.
=


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Robert Kjettrup <robert@stvmayday.dk> wrote:
Hi

As fa= r as i remember, this has always been the case with 3d in AE and vector lay= ers... :-(

- Robert




2013/6/6 Byron Nash &l= t;byronnash@gmail.= com>
I just noticed that when I make a layer 3D it becomes soft= er on the edges. I'm dealing with a shape layer in this case and was co= mparing it to the Illustrator layer I created it from. Even though the laye= r doesn't really move in space when I enable and disable 3D it gets jus= t a touch softer. I don't have DOF enabled for my camera. Has this alwa= ys happened?



--047d7b6222d096705204de80cd83--