| If Apple had only known they could have consulted with this forum to find out what the average high performance mac user wants…
I own many macs, currently have a renderfarm of 5 over-clocked water-cooled hackintoshes, and I don't think those fit the average user any better than this machine. They can be a time suck and a pita…
Most people on this forum bill for their time until they start talking about how much money they can save building computers...
My main workstation is a Mac Pro and I imagine it will be for awhile. I don't want to mess with - build - troubleshoot etc. my main source of income. Talk about unnecessary stress.
Cooling, you can't really compare this to a ridiculous PC box that is blowing air every direction out of multiple components without any thought whatsoever as to what is creating the heat where and how best to get it out.
I was hoping for a rack mount expandable Mac Pro replacement, but I'm not totally hating this new format yet. It would be nice to have a Nvidia card option. I can't imagine a 64GB RAM limit but we'll have to wait and see. That would be the biggest mistake I see so far with these new machines.
- You haven't been able to upgrade a chip in a MacPro for years - they're soldered in.
All this is just another biased opinion… For what it's worth… I imagine Apple has a better handle on their customer base than I.
Dennis Wilkins
I'd say the point is not that you can or can't (or wouldn't) overclock the mac pro, it's that it is extremely easy to overclock a much cheaper PC. Which then makes it even more valuable when compared to the MP in terms of both price and render power.
|