Return-Path: Received: from qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.227] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5102601 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:56:20 +0200 Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id n3971l0011ZMdJ40176CQk; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:06:12 +0000 Received: from sz0119.ev.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.40.137]) by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id n76C1l00d2xZMJ48c76CCq; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:06:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:06:12 +0000 (UTC) From: pixelbot@comcast.net To: After Effects Mail List Message-ID: <1301830409.141972.1370977572612.JavaMail.root@sz0119a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [AE] New MacPro MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_141971_2074023521.1370977572609" X-Originating-IP: [::ffff:107.1.199.10] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.13_GA_2944 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Mac)/6.0.13_GA_2944) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1370977572; bh=G42xOPfA+jDvdPo5lN9MfmEBnf+kpr58IBolEJ2PDSA=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=Hzxj8Q1DUdPcHDyoBD3DtyAM0UX/tRcRD1lO2iWJKPTqbPOi2qK4dsMXYImFChp0f JMYP15dOPZB54WZL/1rJzUTqS4TFUnZdwXHJ1B16h8Vf1hlmYdpimm0gLgXJD5VwSj C4k8CA/L1DLdhS5nz1RA31+vKbZw68wqEuYeQtsyB6HNSPLm5ioQ6Xr0jXkXvVvTEg GyAzL17CBJgtEVGEP0DZRdioY4FDKHYyp4AC2kpf6W0YOhApnnOaqFPq2EblFmO/0n LkjKF4NrtHGafhEe0rN7Op/n+rxWrl0tHwNEm12bfpy9GNcmTMh3niR489G2jaF5S9 JbZNZET5RhAfQ== ------=_Part_141971_2074023521.1370977572609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit thanks dan, well said, I have to agree with you, with one minor correction - apple only mentions that the memory thru-put is 60GB/s that isn't the capacity. I would guess the RAM is in an increment of 8 (ie 32, 64, or 128) just a guess. tt ps I must spend too much time on Facebook as I wanted to "like" your response - consider this a like ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Spiess" To: "After Effects Mail List" Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:58:37 AM Subject: Re: [AE] New MacPro God, what a bunch of negative blockheads on this list. I just read all 60+ posts on this subject. You complain about the price of the new Mac Pro, but you don't know how much they will sell it for. You complain about the graphics, but you haven't seen any benchmarks. You complain about too many cables, without understanding ANYTHING about thunderbolt, cause if you did, you'd know you can daisy chain all your external devices. You don't know how much ram you can get into the Mac Pro, when a simple check of the Apple web site reveals up to 60 gigs. You perceive a computer that's not fast enough, doesn't have great GPU's and yet you have NO idea how it will stack up to competitors computers. It's time to get off your high horses and realize that it doe not matter till we have real world tests. Then you can trash it. Also, I doubt we will see this new computer till most likely early next year (when Intel releases the new Thunderbolt 2 chips), so lots can change between now and then. And just because I responded to Dennis' post, does not mean I'm directing this at him. Dan Spiess ------=_Part_141971_2074023521.1370977572609 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= div style=3D'font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>thanks da= n, well said, I have to agree with you, with one minor correction - apple o= nly mentions that the memory thru-put is 60GB/s that isn't the capacity. I = would guess the RAM is in an increment of 8 (ie 32, 64, or 128) just a gues= s.

tt

ps I must spend too much = time on Facebook as I wanted to "like" your response - consider this a like=

From: "Dan Spiess" <dspiess@lighthousetv= .com>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.t= v>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:58:37 AM
Subject: Re: [AE] New MacPro

God, what a bunch of negative blockheads on thi= s list. I just read all 60+ posts on this subject.

You complain abou= t the price of the new Mac Pro, but you don't know how much they will sell = it for.

You complain about the graphics, but you haven't seen any b= enchmarks.

You complain about too many cables, without understanding= ANYTHING about thunderbolt, cause if you did, you'd know you can daisy cha= in all your external devices.

You don't know how much ram you can g= et into the Mac Pro, when a simple check of the Apple web site reveals up t= o 60 gigs.

You perceive a computer that's not fast enough, doesn't = have great GPU's and yet you have NO idea how it will stack up to competito= rs computers.

It's time to get off your high horses and realize tha= t it doe not matter till we have real world tests. Then you can trash it.
Also, I doubt we will see this new computer till most likely early ne= xt year (when Intel releases the new Thunderbolt 2 chips), so lots can chan= ge between now and then.

And just because I responded to Dennis' pos= t, does not mean I'm directing this at him.

Dan Spiess
------=_Part_141971_2074023521.1370977572609--