Return-Path: Received: from biz127.inmotionhosting.com ([205.134.238.11] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5102749 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:02:09 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=reelsolutions.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:To:References:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Content-Type:From; bh=e6xEIpTy3pDfyqJrAYBhi4RE0YEcYt/ZmZ068tf6jak=; b=c1DBkBfeLz46oN8oV/lzXP9RRuFSe1LvnmZZYgrFb5UyTupeEwmk7CLkWMHBfaqPDlqycZRZF18YXjcpHe81L2G02C99a3LdOwCwWM4iHQBJrBdbXXLf41t1pjvM+Hg9; Received: from c-71-202-7-62.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([71.202.7.62]:54453 helo=[192.168.1.91]) by biz127.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UmVr6-0000VG-0B for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:11:59 -0700 From: Dennis Wilkins Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_98982943-37FD-4641-A4D5-2CD611FA9622" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: [AE] New MacPro Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:11:52 -0700 References: To: "After Effects Mail List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz127.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - reelsolutions.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz127.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: dennis@reelsolutions.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail=_98982943-37FD-4641-A4D5-2CD611FA9622 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Jun 11, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Steve Oakley wrote: > maybe, but I don't see an ROI on spending 50% more for 10-15% faster. = I don't need the fastest CPU, just one thats really fast. my i7 2.93 = 4core averages 5% than my zeon 4X2 2.8 tower. the i7's have more than = good enough performance. I guess you didn't check out the link (http://www.cbscores.com); current = 12-core Xeon machines are closer to 75-80% faster than the fastest = available over-clocked 6-core i7 chips. Cost/performance wise, i7 CPU's = are very good CPU's. This new machine will be expensive, as all Mac Pro's have been (relative = to the average PC), but I also think it will be an amazing performer. - Dennis Wilkins --Apple-Mail=_98982943-37FD-4641-A4D5-2CD611FA9622 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 steveo@practicali.com> = wrote:

maybe, but I don't see an ROI = on spending 50% more for 10-15% faster. I don't need the fastest CPU, = just one thats really fast. my i7 2.93 4core averages 5% than my = zeon 4X2 2.8 tower. the i7's have more than good enough = performance.

I guess you didn't check out the link (http://www.cbscores.com); current = 12-core Xeon machines are closer to 75-80% faster than the fastest = available over-clocked 6-core i7 chips. Cost/performance wise, i7 CPU's = are very good CPU's.

This new machine will be = expensive, as all Mac Pro's have been (relative to the average PC), but = I also think it will be an amazing performer.

- = Dennis Wilkins

= --Apple-Mail=_98982943-37FD-4641-A4D5-2CD611FA9622--