Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5112577 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:12:17 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f14so494369qak.7 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:22:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ykCVo6iw1K9dogoQ07jCFON+SKgfrdok7VwCXgL36Ao=; b=K5VEhUegmL00wYQlEI5zBcHdYMNOQb35lA0Aspb0TYqGSeoNT/fP0Fe7lVoFynHSlZ bGNC6/hi6+/YRoU5jMjKidSSArnQt746he1v37HPV8BTWeVvZ/Q3A3UiZgUQhZpusDzJ 945xFNcDuuA4TmcDzp0ghHmsumJ5yAwHYwlsZe+9VjD7TDpOCV72v3RNcnlThGSdnfRq dtZFrt0AH0i/avrR2WVDA6YYoWO1lOtSzKUyZPuuKWsKJCjpZz/pPDCRyi/NTo/EuiMJ KnbbxOsh7LNLzR8H4q88vVyAYIA4YCAbaASJvivV6neMzXpfujYi3YfP+nCGOK6Mm/7F QXTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.196.5 with SMTP id ee5mr1277551qcb.122.1371655344972; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.223.132 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:22:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:22:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] After Effects CC (12.0) From: Greg Balint To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3081e9767d704df8365da --001a11c3081e9767d704df8365da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah, i've seen some decent speed when comp viewer is at quarter resolution and Cineware is on software mode. It's basically taking screengrabs from the c4d viewport and feeding them to AE via TCP connection. so it's probably never going to be a realtime thing unless they rebuild the software render portion of Cineware down the road. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Michael Malone wrote: > I haven't figured that one out yet. My current workflow has been to render > separate elements (not multi-pass) from C4D for the ultimate in flexibility > down the road. I might try the new AE integration on a smaller project and > see how I like it using object buffers. I wish it were possible to have > some kind of hardware acceleration in AE for the Cineware effect. Seems a > tad slow. > > > On Jun 18, 2013, at 10:28 pm, Rendernyc wrote: > > > What cineware features do you find amazing? > > What do you see using in your workflow that is an improvement? > > > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > --001a11c3081e9767d704df8365da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah, i've seen some decent speed when comp viewer is = at quarter resolution and Cineware is on software mode. =A0It's basical= ly taking screengrabs from the c4d viewport and feeding them to AE via TCP = connection. so it's probably never going to be a realtime thing unless = they rebuild the software render portion of Cineware down the road.

On Wed, Jun 1= 9, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Michael Malone <mmalone@mac.com> wrote:

I haven't figured that one out yet. My current workflow has been to ren= der separate elements (not multi-pass) from C4D for the ultimate in flexibi= lity down the road. I might try the new AE integration on a smaller project= and see how I like it using object buffers. I wish it were possible to hav= e some kind of hardware acceleration in AE for the Cineware effect. Seems a= tad slow.

On Jun 18, 2013, at 10:28 pm, Rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:

> What cineware features do you find amazing?
> What do you see using in your workflow that is an improvement?
>

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--001a11c3081e9767d704df8365da--