Return-Path: Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com ([17.158.161.5] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5146531 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:12:57 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.68] (99-152-153-100.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.153.100]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.04(7.0.4.27.3) 64bit (built Mar 7 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MQ500A361FZOG40@nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:24:01 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-07-18_06:2013-07-18,2013-07-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=1 spamscore=1 ipscore=0 suspectscore=8 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1305010000 definitions=main-1307180107 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: [AE] lossless codec in a container roundup From: Jim Curtis In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:23:59 -0500 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <4B89E338-1C61-4166-BE86-368F6EE96B34@me.com> References: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) I'm on Macs. I use ProRes with Quicktime and it's awesome, but it's reportedly not = too Windows-friendly, without hacks. DNxHD is 10-bit, 4444, and free, but not versatile, since it's = restricted to a set of frame sizes and frame rates. e.g., you can't = make a 300x300 pixel pre-render for use as an element in Ae; you're = stuck with PAL, NTSC and HD frame sizes and rates. I think Avid made it = much more complicated than necessary. I discovered one that looks interesting, called "UT Video." It seems to = have the right specs: It's free, alpha support, 4444, but it's only = 8-bit, which is a downside. I've looked at Cineform, but it's not been totally stable for me, and = it's not free, which means it's not universal. A lot of people recommend QT Photo-JPEG at 92% quality. No alpha. Not = sure of the bit-depth. There's also QT PNG, but I don't use it, because ProRes is more = efficient. It supports alpha. Wasn't Adobe working on a Cinema PNG format? For BMD cameras? What's = up with that? =20 All these I mentioned aren't lossless, although most are visually = lossless. Some lossless codecs shouldn't even be called "codecs" = because there's no compression and decompression taking place. It's a = term akin to "married bachelor." It's a contradiction. I'm interested to read other insights on this as well. On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Louai Abu-Osba wrote: > Hey All, >=20 > I'm generally curious what everyone is using for a lossless codec = these days. > I'm also specifically looking for a Windows friendly, resolution > independent lossless codec in either an avi or mov container. >=20 > -louai >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to