DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=louai.org; h=mime-version
	:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=louai.org; b=Q
	UwGYLiRogTSSoFI8GvPiow4tU5FpnDZlSebohkmcHa8eTLaVPByp87i3QnrmgVl9
	trwDWUst7WivJNpwIZE5wM3unM+ZXGLbjqiyTM3BHyKl91Kf7ye1DtD+K2TsPsUl
	dFoxLCsmhrGhrgR6R+MAE7+yZwp5iHt+OerbSf2fz0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <list-5146532@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-5146532@media-motion.tv>
From: Louai Abu-Osba <me@louai.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:40:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CABan1zMjmjXbG-FfKqG+ALXcdOXedK+DhtDab-JyYAUfWZ+ZGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] lossless codec in a container roundup
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

UT Video is pretty interesting, wasn't aware of that one. 8 bit only
is a bit unfortunate, but I find that I tend to use exr's if I need to
store float values. Have you been using UT? I'm going to give it a
whack over the next week.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jim Curtis <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote:
> I'm on Macs.
>
> I use ProRes with Quicktime and it's awesome, but it's reportedly not too=
 Windows-friendly, without hacks.
>
> DNxHD is 10-bit, 4444, and free, but not versatile, since it's restricted=
 to a set of frame sizes and frame rates.  e.g., you can't make a 300x300 p=
ixel pre-render for use as an element in Ae; you're stuck with PAL, NTSC an=
d HD frame sizes and rates.  I think Avid made it much more complicated tha=
n necessary.
>
> I discovered one that looks interesting, called "UT Video." It seems to h=
ave the right specs:  It's free, alpha support, 4444, but it's only 8-bit, =
which is a downside.
>
> I've looked at Cineform, but it's not been totally stable for me, and it'=
s not free, which means it's not universal.
>
> A lot of people recommend QT Photo-JPEG at 92% quality.  No alpha.  Not s=
ure of the bit-depth.
>
> There's also QT PNG, but I don't use it, because ProRes is more efficient=
.  It supports alpha.
>
> Wasn't Adobe working on a Cinema PNG format?  For BMD cameras?  What's up=
 with that?
>
> All these I mentioned aren't lossless, although most are visually lossles=
s.  Some lossless codecs shouldn't even be called "codecs" because there's =
no compression and decompression taking place.  It's a term akin to "marrie=
d bachelor."  It's a contradiction.
>
> I'm interested to read other insights on this as well.
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Louai Abu-Osba wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I'm generally curious what everyone is using for a lossless codec these =
days.
>> I'm also specifically looking for  a Windows friendly, resolution
>> independent lossless codec in either an avi or mov container.
>>
>> -louai
>>
>> +---End of message---+
>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>
>
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>