Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5157133 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 09:48:04 +0200 Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b47so1919025eek.7 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys :content-type; bh=ylBYJ79droHyDjONf194NRvqdmCX++6ZpMzx/bo1JnU=; b=KrLh2OsQ7K+WJoCEqs8gFVMQfwct1daj2AIIAXyf7SyFuuX4kFgKSJ9M+v1Js8ky0Q ckv8M3Fda2IseevX6iqKaCYBbss1eJKblutTGMIW2hEFzV6QSiuCJExAl9rPtBV5nPTa qgRlry4Mb25Dq+/FBqM8tK+GnmUblVOzUz98mNWqMFMMtNxMKWtLwtV4EbBROqQNLt6a PTLTBx7yhQbspBAIqZtUgJHk1vUHAk4VOVM+QQxCQKcshvxmGT2nRPSjUUx2DbuDm80Z g3QqlYUiBp5Q/eYiUoZ7YRLs8aghYjalDVas25/oCl1t2LJbs9mZiz9T6cUY47xPUjjt y15A== X-Received: by 10.15.54.198 with SMTP id t46mr51065281eew.74.1374911965602; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.5] (cust-233-240.on4.ontelecoms.gr. [92.118.233.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r54sm86312720eev.8.2013.07.27.00.59.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51F37E71.9040101@gmail.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Evan Fotis Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:01:53 +0300 From: Evan Fotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] Monitors. References: In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130727110153318 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020707020904080100050802" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020707020904080100050802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit For what its worth both the LG and the Dell 2713H use the same 10bit wide gamut panel (8bit panel+ AFRC) I'd go with the Dell , better ergonomics. The cheaper Dell 2713HM covers the SRGB color space Review of both Dells http://www.prad.de/en/monitore/review/2013/review-dell-u2713h.html http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2713h.htm http://www.prad.de/en/monitore/review/2012/review-dell-u2713hm.html http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2713hm.htm One note with the SRGB model, one cannot use both custom RGB sliders and color temperature to calibrate. It is either or. For me the custom settings gives best results but is a bit on the coolside. From another forum > I'd take the Dell for the support and no-PWM/better stand. The LG is a > cheap attempt to make huge margins by compromising on quality : this > screen has a PWM frequency of 130 Hz!!! My ZR2440W, in comparison does > 380 Hz and the U2312HM does north of 300 Hz as well. Anything less > than 280-300 Hz on LED screens is asking for potential trouble and > eyestrain. On 27-Jul-13 03:59, Lachlan Westfall wrote: > ies but I�ve never been able to find one to look at. I was at Fry�s > today and saw the LG 27EA83-D. It didn't look too bad to be honest... > > I'd buy the Apple display in a second if it wasn't for the glossy surface. > In my studio I have a window behind me. The reflections would drive me nutz. --------------020707020904080100050802 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit For what its worth both the LG and the Dell 2713H  use the same 10bit wide gamut panel (8bit panel+ AFRC) I'd go with the Dell , better ergonomics.
The cheaper Dell 2713HM covers the SRGB color space
Review of both Dells
http://www.prad.de/en/monitore/review/2013/review-dell-u2713h.html
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2713h.htm

http://www.prad.de/en/monitore/review/2012/review-dell-u2713hm.html
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2713hm.htm

One note with the SRGB model, one cannot use both custom RGB sliders and color temperature to calibrate. It is either or. For me the custom settings gives best results but is a bit on the coolside.

From another forum
I'd take the Dell for the support and no-PWM/better stand. The LG is a cheap attempt to make huge margins by compromising on quality : this screen has a PWM frequency of 130 Hz!!! My ZR2440W, in comparison does 380 Hz and the U2312HM does north of 300 Hz as well. Anything less than 280-300 Hz on LED screens is asking for potential trouble and eyestrain.

On 27-Jul-13 03:59, Lachlan Westfall wrote:
ies but I�ve never been able to find one to look at. I was at Fry�s
today and saw the LG 27EA83-D. It didn't look too bad to be honest...

I'd buy the Apple display in a second if it wasn't for the glossy surface.
In my studio I have a window behind me. The reflections would drive me nutz.

--------------020707020904080100050802--