| ||||||||||
| That sounds right. It's a RAW sequence for video, not something you'd use as an intermediate. On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems like Cinema DNG is aimed mainly at capture devices where what we are > after is a mastering format to be able to transport video files in one > container through the post process. > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Louai Abu-Osba <me@louai.org> wrote: >> >> The BMC camera's use Cinema DNG. Stu Maschwitz describes an >> interesting workflow with Lightroom to process Cinema DNGs: >> http://prolost.com/letscook >> >> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Todd Kopriva <toddkopriva@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > No, it's not dead. It's a standard that has been released for a variety >> > of >> > companies to use, support, maintan, and extend. >> > >> > See this: >> > >> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/09/cinemadng-in-after-effects-cs6-and-elsewhere.html >> > >> > >> > On Sunday, July 28, 2013, Jim Curtis wrote: >> >> >> >> So, Cinema DNG is dead, right? >> >> >> >> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/cinemadng.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -------------------------------- >> > Todd Kopriva >> > 1510 E Alder St >> > Seattle, WA 98122 >> > (206)437-2296 >> > -------------------------------- >> > "Mobility is more important than motion." >> > - György Sebők >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> > > |
