Return-Path: Received: from st11p01mm-asmtp001.mac.com ([17.172.204.236] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5160547 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:36:49 +0200 Received: from [10.0.1.8] ([172.251.37.235]) by st11p01mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.06(7.0.4.27.5) 64bit (built May 31 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MQS001QC7WGG660@st11p01mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 03:48:17 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-07-31_02:2013-07-30,2013-07-31,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=9 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1305010000 definitions=main-1307300259 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Monitors From: Gary Reisman In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:48:15 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) 27" is big,. but 30" is amazing. ..and only $1,000 for a few more days: = http://dealmac.com/Dell-Ultra-Sharp-30-2560-x1600-LED-LCD-Display-for-1-00= 0-free-shipping/807420.html On Jul 30, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Lachlan Westfall = wrote: > Fascinating debate on the glossy vs. matte issue. >=20 > I wasn't ready to take the chance and make the change... The DELL = U2713HM > arrived today. >=20 > I've only spent 1/2 a day with it. Pretty nice monitor for a price of = $600 > shipped to my door. >=20 > Thanks for the advice and the tip on this weekend's deal! Probably = shoulda > got a pair of 'em. That second DVI-D port is just mocking me now. >=20 > -Lachlan >=20 > PS: If anyone has any brightness concerns, I've had to turn this thing = DOWN > to about 20-percent. >=20 > On 7/30/13 4:39 PM, "Peter Matulavich" = wrote: >=20 >> I couldn't have said it better, except I would compare a matte screen = to the >> yellowed headlights of a '47 Nash Rambler rather than an '87 Honda, = but that's >> just me. >>=20 >> I think one of the problems with a matte screen is that the treatment = they >> apply to it, while attempting to diffuse the reflection, causes the >> reflection to occur nearer to the monitor surface, rather than deep = into the >> glass as a glossy monitor would do. In so doing, it makes it more = difficult >> to focus short of the reflection -- the two focal planes are too = close >> together. That's my theory, but I don't have a matte monitor to test = it at >> the present time. >>=20 >> Pete >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jul 30, 2013, at 6:00 PM, After Effects Mail List wrote: >>=20 >>> BIG huge second on that. The reflections on matte screens are = unbearable. >>> Glossy screen reflections are easy to see past because they're pin = points - >>> whereas matte screens are just blurred nasty blobs of reflections = that >>> obscure the whole screen and make your graphics/video look like old = foggy >>> yellow'd headlights from a 1987 Honda. At least that's been my = experience >>> since the beginning of glossy screens. >>>=20 >>> I have a big window behind me and never really notice it on my 27" = Apple >>> display (LOVE) - but when I go to work on my cintiq (matte = screen+wacom >>> surface) - it really bothers me and I have to black it out. >>>=20 >>> So don't count glossy screens out - they really have a depth and >>> gorgeousness that can't be matched. I'd never buy matte again = either. >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to