| ||||||||||
| I prefer one big wide high res monitor over multiple screens. And 16:10 over 16:9. But most of all I prefer large pixel count over physical size. I would love to have at least the 2560x1600 ( or 2560x1440) in a ~23" form factor :-) Cheers Søren Sent from my iPhone On 31/07/2013, at 06:08, Gary Reisman <garyreisman@mac.com> wrote: > 30"+27" is even better :D > > As an AE artist, it's great having the 1600 lines of resolution the 30" provides .. you can actually view 1920x1080 at full resolution with space below and on the side. > (and handy using the 27" to display 1920x1080 video full screen and all. > > > > On Jul 30, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Jim Curtis <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote: > >> Agreed. I'd go so far to say that one 30" is preferable than two 27" (which was my last configuration) notwithstanding the reduced total pixel count. >> >> >> >> On Jul 30, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Gary Reisman wrote: >> >>> 27" is big,. but 30" is amazing. >>> ..and only $1,000 for a few more days: >>> >>> http://dealmac.com/Dell-Ultra-Sharp-30-2560-x1600-LED-LCD-Display-for-1-000-free-shipping/807420.html >> >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
