|
|
You should had bought the famous IBM T221.
But now 30" 4K monitors are on their way :-)
Dell announced their models, Sharp and Asus have already launched theirs at a steep price, and Chinese Seiki has 4K 4 the masses at 39 & 50 inches (@ 30hz only due to hdmi 1.4 limitation)
The others have problems too, like windows will recognize them as two 1920x2160 displays instead of a single one..
Hopefully in a year or so these will smooth out.
On 31-Jul-13 13:18, Søren Christensen wrote:
I prefer one big wide high res monitor over multiple screens. And 16:10 over 16:9. But most of all I prefer large pixel count over physical size. I would love to have at least the 2560x1600 ( or 2560x1440) in a ~23" form factor :-)
Cheers
Søren
Sent from my iPhone
On 31/07/2013, at 06:08, Gary Reisman <garyreisman@mac.com> wrote:
30"+27" is even better :D
As an AE artist, it's great having the 1600 lines of resolution the 30" provides .. you can actually view 1920x1080 at full resolution with space below and on the side.
(and handy using the 27" to display 1920x1080 video full screen and all.
On Jul 30, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Jim Curtis <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote:
Agreed. I'd go so far to say that one 30" is preferable than two 27" (which was my last configuration) notwithstanding the reduced total pixel count.
On Jul 30, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Gary Reisman wrote:
27" is big,. but 30" is amazing.
..and only $1,000 for a few more days:
http://dealmac.com/Dell-Ultra-Sharp-30-2560-x1600-LED-LCD-Display-for-1-000-free-shipping/807420.html
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
|
|
