| ||||||||||
| Jim, I like one 30" over two 27" because the mouse excursion from extreme left to right is shorter and therefore easier/faster. And I'm able to put my broadcast display closer to my workspace, which results in less neck strain. I have a second workstation with only a 27" display, and it feels too cramped for all my palettes and tabs in Ae and Pr by comparison. On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Jim Feeley wrote: > When I worked on a 30-inch monitor a few years ago, it felt way too big...like I had to increase distance between my eyes and the screen. I preferred two 24-inch monitors (plus a video monitor) Was only on the 30-inch for three months. For those of you who use those, did you like the size right away, or did you have to get used to it? > > Also, anyone here tried a 29-inch 21:9 display, such as this 2560x1080 model from Dell? $700: > http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&orig_s=gen&sku=225-4201&s=bsd > Perhaps not the best solution for AE, but interesting.... > > > Jim > > On Jul 31, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Evan Fotis wrote: > >> You should had bought the famous IBM T221. >> But now 30" 4K monitors are on their way :-) >> Dell announced their models, Sharp and Asus have already launched theirs at a steep price, and Chinese Seiki has 4K 4 the masses at 39 & 50 inches (@ 30hz only due to hdmi 1.4 limitation) >> The others have problems too, like windows will recognize them as two 1920x2160 displays instead of a single one.. >> Hopefully in a year or so these will smooth out. >> >> On 31-Jul-13 13:18, Søren Christensen wrote: >>> I prefer one big wide high res monitor over multiple screens. And 16:10 over 16:9. But most of all I prefer large pixel count over physical size. I would love to have at least the 2560x1600 ( or 2560x1440) in a ~23" form factor :-) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Søren > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
