| ||||||||||
| Amen brother.... -L On 7/31/13 12:08 PM, "Brian Maffitt" <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote: > From a 50-year old user's perspective, while I love the extra real estate, I > deplore the higher resolution when we have no user control over scaling the > interface. I sold my 30" Cinema Display and now use three 24" monitors > instead. > > I really thought this was a problem that would be solved by now, but using a > high-resolution display means I basically have to work with reading glasses > on, which is not my first choice. I'm really surprised that there isn't a "UI > scale" slider in all applications, to let a user fine-tune an application to > their native resolution at a custom scale. > > Brian > >> Apart from personal preference, i think it depends on use and applications. >> Generally speaking for 3d modelling, Photoshop work and AE, one could argue >> that a larger high res 30'er or more! right in front of the user is >> preferable. >> (Usually paired with a 4:3 20er in portrait for fluff). >> >> For editing, Premiere and multitasking it would be two 24 or smaller >> displays along with a broadcast display. >> >> On 31-Jul-13 19:13, Jim Curtis wrote: >>> Jim, I like one 30" over two 27" because the mouse excursion from extreme >>> left to right is shorter and therefore easier/faster. And I'm able to put >>> my broadcast display closer to my workspace, which results in less neck >>> strain. >>> >>> I have a second workstation with only a 27" display, and it feels too >>> cramped for all my palettes and tabs in Ae and Pr by comparison. >>> >>> >>> On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Jim Feeley wrote: >>> >>>> When I worked on a 30-inch monitor a few years ago, it felt way too >>>> big...like I had to increase distance between my eyes and the screen. I >>>> preferred two 24-inch monitors (plus a video monitor) Was only on the >>>> 30-inch for three months. For those of you who use those, did you like the >>>> size right away, or did you have to get used to it? >>>> >>>> Also, anyone here tried a 29-inch 21:9 display, such as this 2560x1080 >>>> model from Dell? $700: >>>> http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&orig_s=gen& >>>> sku=225-4201&s=bsd >>>> Perhaps not the best solution for AE, but interesting.... >>>> >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> On Jul 31, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Evan Fotis wrote: >>>> >>>>> You should had bought the famous IBM T221. >>>>> But now 30" 4K monitors are on their way :-) >>>>> Dell announced their models, Sharp and Asus have already launched theirs >>>>> at a steep price, and Chinese Seiki has 4K 4 the masses at 39 & 50 inches >>>>> (@ 30hz only due to hdmi 1.4 limitation) >>>>> The others have problems too, like windows will recognize them as two >>>>> 1920x2160 displays instead of a single one.. >>>>> Hopefully in a year or so these will smooth out. >>>>> >>>>> On 31-Jul-13 13:18, S�ren Christensen wrote: >>>>>> I prefer one big wide high res monitor over multiple screens. And 16:10 >>>>>> over 16:9. But most of all I prefer large pixel count over physical size. >>>>>> I would love to have at least the 2560x1600 ( or 2560x1440) in a ~23" >>>>>> form factor :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> S�ren >>>> +---End of message---+ >>>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> >>> >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> >>> >> >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
