|
|
An SSD is going to be faster than a mechanical disk for the cache. Also, the bus speed matters, so an internally installed disk is going to be faster than something connected over an external connection in nearly every case. From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Evan Fotis
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2013 13:36
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] RENDER TIMES A two 1TB drive RAID0 is used for cache at the moment. Would an SSD be speedier?
Right now the queue shows an average of 11sec/frame, giving an estimate 3H,47M and going up to complete the 1609 frames...
curiously cpu usage is not maxed though (about 50-60%) i remember on other projects it hit 100% and stayed pegged there...
will definitely have to change some settings when done. On 16-Aug-13 23:12, Todd Kopriva wrote: If you’re rerendering something to incorporate changes, then you really want to be using the disk cache, since that will re-use previously rendered elements when they’re unchanged. Having the disk cache on a fast SSD really helps there. Of course, this is only true on After Effects CS6 and later. Also, if on After Effects CS6, make sure that you’ve installed the updates. There are a lot of cache fixes in them. The Trapcode plug-ins also have had some cache-related fixes, so be sure that you’re up to date on them, too. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote: Hi all,
have some heavy comps here using TC Form etc, and even at 720p, rendering one a one minute comp takes well over an hour and half to finish...
Since there is a lot of back n forth discussing, rerendering etc, what could be the best way to speed up render times without changing the project?
I could get to add something in the machine, but not much, like an ssd for cache or new gpu at most, but would these help at all? or OC perhaps..
thanx
\
|
|
