Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5178461 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:33:40 +0200 Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id j10so1343576qcx.25 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=oyHtC81Jq+QOJllU8ytXHs/eLS1Lf66C6Y3Iyp3GmJ0=; b=jZQ/aO6qyWuaELO8ilrzyC/QmFDNUOZFZUuRUH5Sejai1v4GUKeQ7/ww2FMq75ARbM 4jMO14OCJaKUdIHdYukPKAEnDTLhYrp9yZZ+lMrmFfJiO6aLc97cOUOcOwkVgi8Yc18E V/qiOXwJlPDOHk1C9/9zgBopZNCwhmjZq69BZPproC/Ldhggvd7TQpVIAnUGY/e+yMNs BK7jY9+4lFs+AZ15xS+qEFvbDOIHUieB3w/ROx0ldWStW9+AZJG7YlzoHJTW+iWSbnpF 03mQ3UolWVbjEGdlU/5IYINlVPxZZsV44n+tN1owo8+UOCSbIB1qD88xIxaCh3jqoqMx KZ4w== X-Received: by 10.224.162.210 with SMTP id w18mr5751864qax.56.1376685939629; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:45:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.116.49 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:44:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:44:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] RENDER TIMES To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014948fa66245b04e416ac8d --089e014948fa66245b04e416ac8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A good SSD could be up to 3x faster if on a SATA 6GB connection. Of course you will lose the capacity unless you spend a lot. Additionally there are some very render intensive settings in form - watch your particle count and make sure things are turned down to the minimum that looks ok, then crank the quality for the final. Work in 8bit color, tweak your MP settings, etc. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Evan Fotis wrote: > A two 1TB drive RAID0 is used for cache at the moment. Would an SSD be > speedier? > Right now the queue shows an average of 11sec/frame, giving an estimate > 3H,47M and going up to complete the 1609 frames... > curiously cpu usage is not maxed though (about 50-60%) i remember on othe= r > projects it hit 100% and stayed pegged there... > will definitely have to change some settings when done. > > On 16-Aug-13 23:12, Todd Kopriva wrote: > > If you=92re rerendering something to incorporate changes, then you reall= y > want to be using the disk cache, since that will re-use previously render= ed > elements when they=92re unchanged. Having the disk cache on a fast SSD > really helps there.**** > > ** ** > > Of course, this is only true on After Effects CS6 and later. Also, if on > After Effects CS6, make sure that you=92ve installed the updates. There a= re a > lot of cache fixes in them. The Trapcode plug-ins also have had some > cache-related fixes, so be sure that you=92re up to date on them, too.***= * > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Evan Fotis wrote:= * > *** > > Hi all, > have some heavy comps here using TC Form etc, and even at 720p, rendering > one a one minute comp takes well over an hour and half to finish... > Since there is a lot of back n forth discussing, rerendering etc, what > could be the best way to speed up render times without changing the proje= ct? > I *could* get to add something in the machine, but not much, like an ssd > for cache or new gpu at most, but would these help at all? or OC perhaps.= . > thanx**** > > > \**** > > ** ** > > > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --089e014948fa66245b04e416ac8d Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A good SSD could be up to 3x faster if on a SATA 6GB conne= ction. Of course you will lose the capacity unless you spend a lot. Additio= nally there are some very render intensive settings in form - watch your pa= rticle count and make sure things are turned down to the minimum that looks= ok, then crank the quality for the final. Work in 8bit color, tweak your M= P settings, etc.=A0


On Fri,= Aug 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
A two 1TB drive RAID0 is used for cache at the moment. Would an SSD be speedier?
Right now the queue shows an average of 11sec/frame, giving an estimate 3H,47M and going up to complete the 1609 frames...
curiously cpu usage is not maxed though (about 50-60%) i remember on other projects it hit 100% and stayed pegged there...
will definitely have to change some settings when done.

On 16-Aug-13 23:12, Todd Kopriva wrote:
=20 =20 =20

If you=92re rerendering something to incorporate changes, then you really want to be using the disk cache, since that will re-use previously rendered elements when they=92re unchanged. Having the disk cache on a=A0 fast SSD really helps there.

=A0=

Of course, this is only true on After Effects CS6 and later. Also, if on After Effects CS6, make sure that you=92ve installed the updates. There are a lot of cache fixes in them. The Trapcode plug-ins also have had some cache-related fixes, so be sure that you=92re up to date on them, too.=

=A0=

=A0=

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,
have some heavy comps here using TC Form etc, and even at 720p, rendering one a one minute comp takes well over an hour and half to finish...
Since there is a lot of back n forth discussing, rerendering etc, what could be the best way to speed up render times without changing the project?
I could=A0 get to add something in the machine, but not much, like an ssd for cache or new gpu at most, but would these help at all? or OC perhaps..
thanx


\

=A0





--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--089e014948fa66245b04e416ac8d--