Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5186321 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 19:38:32 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id o13so1161268qaj.18 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=erQgnWAt48ZsXHFbLYKIMRh7c6CIaNy0qk4FD0RBo+c=; b=l1uxhqZ/kDfPpVkhkyr5ehtErnjvEYiAVLNAeTVGmH8SbHo5z7RzThzO4CWqbBW1FF hKvzW/Y5/Z0EYPVdSYK/kRBzyTCW35OqNvZloQ09txUtpJaE/azC2cGw85s68vzJz66k 5sd/ZC/jeLAx15+FzuDCW5/85MwJrCqbzprtjUefXMH5Mi1JRJOVgi3LZQCvH9YxXKEj k/JX60eNdul1DreVI9wydijUPaq8VPjWhX11Q5RmxNJtQb7If/FcE8aVLr5mQ1e33o6E TQ/LuS+5bWt1ovJWmsXPt0oyyKGJXWXIRGvPDavJf/zo4voRkVhAJlLIrn61fKh6SIDS HAUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.166.129 with SMTP id m1mr264927qay.46.1377280245450; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.116.49 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:50:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] USA and the emerging 'Software Piracy Gap'!! From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b60457cc94e2204e4a10bc4 --047d7b60457cc94e2204e4a10bc4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jeff, just to play the devil's advocate here, and I DO NOT support piracy in any way, shape or form, it is especially criminal at large places that can afford it and choose to steal to help their bottom line, but doesnt the responsibility to protect the software lie with the developer? Hear me out. If you have a $2,000 bike wouldnt you put a lock on it when you go inside? Sure, theres no lock in the world that is 100% theft proof, but there are locks that are extremely difficult to break and will reasonably protect your investment. My tech knowledge of these things are pretty low, but if your software is so good everyone wants to steal it, maybe look into hardware dongles, better encryption, etc? If it is too hard to crack people will just give up and buy it? Right? Maybe? On Friday, August 23, 2013, Jeff Krebs wrote: > hmm we see number 10 as are biggest issue. 1 or 2 major studios per day > are reported to us. > This is not an individual trying out some software - These hundreds of > licenses per studio per day. > > > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7b60457cc94e2204e4a10bc4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff, just to play the devil's advocate here, and I DO NOT support pira= cy in any way, shape or form, it is especially criminal at large places tha= t can afford it and choose to steal to help their bottom line, but doesnt t= he responsibility to protect the software=A0lie with the developer? Hear me= out. If you have a $2,000 bike wouldnt you put a lock on it when you go in= side? Sure, theres no lock in the world that is=A0100% theft proof, but the= re are locks that are extremely=A0difficult to break and will reasonably pr= otect your investment. My tech knowledge of these things are pretty low, bu= t if your software is so good everyone wants to steal it, maybe look into h= ardware dongles, better encryption, etc? If it is too hard to crack people = will just give up and buy it? Right? Maybe?=A0

On Friday, August 23, 2013, Jeff Krebs wrote:
hmm we see number 10 as are biggest issue. 1 or = 2 major studios per day are reported to us.
This is not an individual trying out some software - These hundreds of lice= nses per studio per day.




--
Animator &= Editor
www.teddygage.com=
Brooklyn

--047d7b60457cc94e2204e4a10bc4--