Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5187242 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 02:18:16 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id qd12so3020608ieb.18 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:30:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:from:content-type:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KLDwtcugZ4gPNZVolEF9118ewut465kb7S/6BYhxKWo=; b=GFytIMFWGlEyJ4UhGmNI5Lc6Z4qRbRtHYMVAKDgYCAIWwLPJjbuHL6ouxYWco0RlIQ +55AlB+hdDc6b2PuqzACLMI5oXcBj6eWroD2OfExodM8PNm0/HIHGW7VymdJWl8S/CSn j+2m5+xGa4ttsXwxa9cQWd704X+1exvVLY0hbcZKNhMYNI0HfpA97Us2x+Ub7Vj2TqC4 uM3OlIaPn54GVCIwpHraWjVrjk2ORjAGwlRMiWPDDH/bPAu6JmIIWeVHl4ge0xxKnKKZ esh5R5Cq2ajQYJzemVXA680chv0Ld+GGP9GGTmk1gEGkil/eJpaZ8x7IEmpS+PGLtyuc unjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm9/oK193ZuMxHZwG4QpLol+pfs7tcnOlaj3/ANXhAI2bhib+s8y7pSYmNc3QLKpvaehbrM X-Received: by 10.43.94.133 with SMTP id by5mr3815938icc.7.1377390631304; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [10.0.1.9] (c-76-16-224-218.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [76.16.224.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm7862340igj.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [AE] USA and the emerging 'Software Piracy Gap'!! References: From: Brian Higgins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <6E344C67-6398-4497-AF56-A73EC016BF98@flavor.tv> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:30:28 -0500 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) No actually one hires After Effects artists straight out of high school, do t= hey? Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2013, at 6:17 PM, Steve Oakley wrote: >=20 > On Aug 24, 2013, at 4:51 PM, James Culbertson wrote= : >=20 >> On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Jim Tierney wrote: >>=20 >>>>> I have to say that I think Adobe's method of business with creative cl= oud is the best idea so far. Make the purchase price of your product more at= tainable at a longer stretch profit and more people will be inclined to purc= hase. >>=20 >> The biggest issue for Adobe that I can see is their educational CC group p= ricing. I am going to be teaching career and technical education classes in G= raphic Design and Video Production at our local high school and they cannot a= fford Adobe CC educational pricing in any of its forms. So we will be teachi= ng FCPX/Motion instead of Premiere/After Effects. We are still on Adobe CS2 (= running on Windows 7 in BootCamp because it does not run on OSX 7 and to be c= ompatible with a Roland Vinyl Cutter) and Photoshop Elements 6. We are not a= lone by any means. >=20 > you know the entire point of CC is that everyone stays current, and gets m= ore frequent updates. the entire we're on CS2/3/4 goes out the window and ev= eryone is on CC now. in fact I think its a very serious disservice to the st= udents to be teaching them FCP X / Motion as the primary apps because they j= ust don't have market share. you'd be better off using FCP7 because that res= embles most other NLE's. I suppose whats worse is that the students may well= have adobe CC on their own laptops. I've seen that a lot. you know those ki= ds are paying perfectly good money to learn whats current and relevant and n= ot be using apps that are 6 or 7 years old. why not simply require the stude= nts to have their own machine with CC ? its quite common these days, not dif= ferent than buying books for a class. >=20 > S > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to