Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5191675 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:32:07 +0200 Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h10so3112291eaj.11 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:44:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=1ENxRmmBZAFJr/BdKKELVtU/v1LFHtxUuNxusCHSQvc=; b=J1q4exbDUfRPzkZG4cBP+IjZe4EZsyUynPQwX+oeBR170vR9WrsLwySYQbBGPI3bzb 3zgadgAU1t9z4EebTNgWX+GHjW+jCsljDHdaPHuhPYUedSRotEJz9qLSHUFsFnj+2jcx JFv8fmmUsqBn6k53ttugf0wUFmqSM1TatWM9+vZKGlqMREnE4TApb6uq15TxS49uOrVJ 2qwMND67ZWeWHUEEX1faTKeRd5hLRlCODLjQFNCLTBXfnQ8wlH/k4GiVJVS48BrfEHdM EBTpJEKyM+jAPjkS5inU03M1jESEprS4P+b6p0a2QTd0UuUvTj62FfGK8JSr/A6va8dA o0vA== X-Received: by 10.14.47.200 with SMTP id t48mr12242eeb.142.1377708270946; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.5] (cust-233-240.on4.ontelecoms.gr. [92.118.233.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm38834908eeh.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <521E28EA.2020006@gmail.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Evan Fotis Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:44:26 +0300 From: Evan Fotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a budget of $1500? References: In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130828194426764 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080909020508040407080701" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080909020508040407080701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit great! thanks! On 28-Aug-13 19:12, Todd Kopriva wrote: > > I’d go with the greater number of CUDA cores (GTX 770) over the > greater VRAM (GTX 760). > > FWIW, I’m testing those GPUs this week in After Effects. > > *From:*After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] *On > Behalf Of *Evan Fotis > > ** > > for PP CS6, of equally priced GPU which is better: GF *GTX 770 2Gb > *or *GTX 760 4GB* ? > --------------080909020508040407080701 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit great!
thanks!

On 28-Aug-13 19:12, Todd Kopriva wrote:

I’d go with the greater number of CUDA cores (GTX 770) over the greater VRAM (GTX 760).

FWIW, I’m testing those GPUs this week in After Effects.

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Evan Fotis

for PP CS6, of equally priced GPU which is better: GF GTX 770 2Gb or GTX 760 4GB ?

--------------080909020508040407080701--