Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5191687 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:43:48 +0200 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z5so4922913lbh.23 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=V+3al34Yx7Sa2ENZJocdbPQgNTHSdoCxT3D+CsMvoHU=; b=MB4pzNGGmMCk7Cv3WXr6JWv9w5JKjuaAuiuaA1JKctQx4QsENTBbt8qMMBNG/j4Yq+ WkNZwC9kIXbV3D55pCRgqkM+YvZHtfWxVJcBswBJ6h61eHvgpbWkvHrS07/qAgERmAB8 /9vyUpFfsAvLmc+V4UCWagispKaTCirW1v30s27v9X/34AglBzfuM/J0DI/lehM96yE9 G5CxBpBq0rWs7058LvabhqktgMIObhYO5qLrd0z5Rf46MjLv7ye99POVtGiQX/dMsEJ1 T7XvoL8rOwQlJpmCf7sqXqSrArgroOckeY++39ciWmxa2pmCHoOr3um9ZkvzoRwKzWZt lE0g== X-Received: by 10.152.44.164 with SMTP id f4mr2223608lam.38.1377708972505; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:56:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.168.7 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:55:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lucas Maciel Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:55:52 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a budget of $1500? To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b572e8fffd04e504dd44 --089e0160b572e8fffd04e504dd44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How you will make the benchmarks? Can you show the results? Thanks! On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Evan Fotis wrote: > great! > thanks! > > On 28-Aug-13 19:12, Todd Kopriva wrote: > > I=92d go with the greater number of CUDA cores (GTX 770) over the greate= r > VRAM (GTX 760).**** > > ** ** > > FWIW, I=92m testing those GPUs this week in After Effects. **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] > *On Behalf Of *Evan Fotis > > ** > > for PP CS6, of equally priced GPU which is better: GF *GTX 770 2Gb *or *= GTX > 760 4GB* ?**** > > ** ** > > > --=20 *-----------* *Lucas Maciel*, [image: LinkedIn] [image: Flickr] [image: YouTube] [image: Skype] lucasmpm +55 27 88194985 --089e0160b572e8fffd04e504dd44 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

How you will make the benchmarks? Can you show the results= ?

Thanks!

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:

=20 =20 =20
great!
=A0thanks!

On 28-Aug-13 19:12, Todd Kopriva wrote:

=20 =20 =20

I=92d go with the greater number of CUDA cores (GTX 770) over the greater VRAM (GTX 760).

=A0=

FWIW, I=92m testing those GPUs this week in After Effects. =

=A0=

=A0=

From:<= /span> After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Evan Fotis

for PP CS6, of equally priced GPU which is better:=A0 GF GTX 770 2Gb or GTX 760 4GB ?

=A0

--

-----------
Lucas Maciel,=A0

=A0=A0=A0<= a href=3D"http://www.youtube.com/lucasmpm" style=3D"font-size:80%" target= =3D"_blank">=A0= =A0

=A0lucasmpm

=A0 =A0 =A0+55 27 88194985

=A0

=A0

--089e0160b572e8fffd04e504dd44--