Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5191707 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:58:24 +0200 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fb10so6529297pad.9 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:10:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=fx2dajbAJj8tIK+Uz5qkifXT+A3UNu003dfV/WgR3mU=; b=W+qzMMOv//OktP5xfx3Z1jl48339/xyoQWaD8ZHo7a/aA4/mRdhstECBLuVxj360sb V7/RuhomdFulopsw9UON7S9IODElXH+uyxCQWvlG7r0h/OeGKnPfy8vptW35NMxzEqpW RZ7xF+7PtZz3+jyR6uNFz3UuVa9dWM0ABhBIPkSRAasBYcCY5+CFLi/bTJMqhU5ydeIj 7EQDR7HFUy59HewAEQchheTg2eBXmf/LXrwj30DXdfmzJSUuYXcfvM/jnwtL3sGaFwPp sQt3QXomfMBUmZXtc+4xfNevwH6vy0W8ipiNOqL7jHH2TBEQKqsxy2+7SgWYaQXzXPEh jJ6A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUth96D0CYnwMcsRnO85GhidIT92PaUZfhmWuYiqgxqTK4AhUlUbwHc2OuPrdzLvUv9j2l X-Received: by 10.66.192.132 with SMTP id hg4mr28333700pac.84.1377709847023; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.146] (75-175-6-210.ptld.qwest.net. [75.175.6.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo3sm16888733pbb.15.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:10:43 -0700 From: "Satya G Meka (Lists)" To: After Effects Mail List Message-ID: <4E2CF9DB09EB4D1C8531F15EB7FF9A83@rowbyte.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a budget of $1500? X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="521e2f13_2c27173b_10d04" --521e2f13_2c27173b_10d04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I concur. GTX 580 w/ 3GB VRAM has been my go to recommendation and I find= it very stable. =20 Satya. =20 On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: > Yep I agree with Todd, I barely max out my VRAM in AE or PPRO unless do= ing tons of 3D layering / raytracing stuff. Better off with more cores. H= owever, honestly - IMO he should grab a GTX 580 3GB edition on ebay. It's= actually faster than the newer GTX 6/7 series for CUDA and much cheaper.= I have an SLI rig with 2x GTX 580 that's faster than my GTX Titan... > =20 > =20 > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Lucas Maciel wrote: > > How you will make the benchmarks=3F Can you show the results=3F > > =20 > > Thanks=21 > > =20 > > =20 > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Evan =46otis wrote: > > > great=21 > > > thanks=21 > > > =20 > > > On 28-Aug-13 19:12, Todd Kopriva wrote: > > > > I=E2=80=99d go with the greater number of CUDA cores (GTX 770) ov= er the greater VRAM (GTX 760). =20 > > > > =20 > > > > =46WIW, I=E2=80=99m testing those GPUs this week in After Effects= . =20 > > > > =20 > > > > =20 > > > > =46rom: After Effects Mail List =5Bmailto:AE-List=40media-motion.= tv=5D On Behalf Of Evan =46otis > > > > =20 > > > > for PP CS6, of equally priced GPU which is better: G=46 GTX 770 = 2Gb or GTX 760 4GB =3F =20 > > > > =20 > > > > =20 > > > > =20 > > > > =20 > > > =20 > > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > -- =20 > > =20 > > ----------- > > =20 > > =20 > > Lucas Maciel, =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > lucasmpm > > =20 > > =20 > > +55 27 88194985 (tel:%2B55%2027%2088194985) > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > -- =20 > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com (http://www.teddygage.com) > Brooklyn --521e2f13_2c27173b_10d04 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
I concur. GTX 580 w/ 3GB VRAM has been my go to recom= mendation and I find it very stable.

Satya.
=20

On Wednesday, August 2= 8, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Teddy Gage wrote:

Yep I agree with= Todd, I barely max out my VRAM in AE or PPRO unless doing tons of 3D lay= ering / raytracing stuff. Better off with more cores. However, honestly -= IMO he should grab a GTX 580 3GB edition on ebay. It's actually faster t= han the newer GTX 6/7 series for CUDA and much cheaper. I have an SLI rig= with 2x GTX 580 that's faster than my GTX Titan...


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Lucas Maciel <lucasmpm=40gmail.com> wrote:
How you will make the ben= chmarks=3F Can you show the results=3F

Thanks=21
=


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Evan =46otis <evan.fotis=40gmail.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
great=21
 thanks=21

On 28-Aug-13 19:12, Todd Kopriva wrote:
=20 =20 =20

I=E2=80=99d go with the greater number of CUDA cores (GTX 770) over the greater VRAM (GTX 760).

 

=46WIW, I=E2=80=99m testing those GPUs this week in After Effects.

 

 

=46rom: After Effects Mail List =5Bmailto:AE-List=40media-motion.tv=5D On Behalf= Of Evan =46otis

for PP CS6, of equally priced GPU which is better:  G=46 GTX 770 2Gb or GTX 760 4GB =3F

=

 





<= /div>--

-----------

Luc= as Maciel, 


3D=22LinkedIn=22   3D=22=   


3D=22Skype=22 lucasmpm

     +55 27 88194985

 

 




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com=
Brooklyn
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20

--521e2f13_2c27173b_10d04--