Return-Path: Received: from exprod6og111.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.27] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5191715 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:06:13 +0200 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob111.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUh4w6kJV8VVQF8ymLCrmHN1vyuoPljJK@postini.com; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:18:37 PDT Received: from inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (mail-321.sea.adobe.com [153.32.1.52]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r7SHIW2r016819 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r7SHIRw8002427 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:18:29 -0700 From: Todd Kopriva To: After Effects Mail List Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:18:28 -0700 Subject: RE: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a budget of $1500? Thread-Topic: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a budget of $1500? Thread-Index: Ac6kESqDMzTSa1orQLifNl2g3pLK5AAAQe/g Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B006868B2420FA4F88AB29E127AA783D4A58B6E5EDnambx09corpad_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_B006868B2420FA4F88AB29E127AA783D4A58B6E5EDnambx09corpad_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To be clear, I was just answering between the two choices given, not recomm= ending the GTX 770 over all other cards. I will not answer broad questions = like that. I will just point you to Danny Princz's benchmark test results f= or After Effects and Harm Millaard's benchmark test results for Premiere Pr= o, as I do here: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520 From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Teddy Gage Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 10:07 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effect= s work for a budget of $1500? Yep I agree with Todd, I barely max out my VRAM in AE or PPRO unless doing = tons of 3D layering / raytracing stuff. Better off with more cores. However= , honestly - IMO he should grab a GTX 580 3GB edition on ebay. It's actuall= y faster than the newer GTX 6/7 series for CUDA and much cheaper. I have an= SLI rig with 2x GTX 580 that's faster than my GTX Titan... --_000_B006868B2420FA4F88AB29E127AA783D4A58B6E5EDnambx09corpad_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To be cle= ar, I was just answering between the two choices given, not recommending th= e GTX 770 over all other cards. I will not answer broad questions like that= . I will just point you to Danny Princz’s benchmark test results for = After Effects and Harm Millaard’s benchmark test results for Premiere= Pro, as I do here:

http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520<= /a>

 

<= p class=3DMsoNormal> 

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-mot= ion.tv] On Behalf Of Teddy Gage
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August= 2013 10:07
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [A= E] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a bu= dget of $1500?

&= nbsp;

Yep I agree with Todd, I barely ma= x out my VRAM in AE or PPRO unless doing tons of 3D layering / raytracing s= tuff. Better off with more cores. However, honestly - IMO he should grab a = GTX 580 3GB edition on ebay. It's actually faster than the newer GTX 6/7 se= ries for CUDA and much cheaper. I have an SLI rig with 2x GTX 580 that's fa= ster than my GTX Titan...

 

= --_000_B006868B2420FA4F88AB29E127AA783D4A58B6E5EDnambx09corpad_--