Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.216.54] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5191752 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:34:53 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id cm18so597685qab.20 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=VUAt2p+3NSLvXM5U//RozWdwpbyQ7U2+vDlRmcfuvvU=; b=boN0mvY29i5V9+Fhd7T7wIb7zInux68+sGd0pXwfCLKFj7mzh8a2h2AXK/Y6ayxKgs 0ZrKQs3I65yLFL+51eG8vo30Nu4I+LsfwMCYyJZ85ZEWxFjhcDl2ZhlgYyZhGK9wgUiF 46N9jTCMyBfURZ/5GvvT7pxKXOwdJG6LekV2x3HDRFgtFb3100v9u3IIbvDFyrcXOpeh +Cgun0PUMncWhVFL3Q9mGJyMCGcjBXpHJiea6GvDwaatINfIbaKN3CzWiG8wGZdPyr+N +oIqL5yckaV6PFLX3FYGtBeMRCIAM10xWYrMOPt/UOWu9fU4K8urwKn0rwKswnOaTG3C 9xXQ== X-Received: by 10.49.75.103 with SMTP id b7mr3461315qew.85.1377712036819; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:47:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.116.49 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:46:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] The currently fastest PC config possible for After Effects work for a budget of $1500? To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd76dba8eb84004e5059489 --047d7bd76dba8eb84004e5059489 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LIES http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/CS6%20Benchmarks%204.pdf On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Todd Kopriva wrote: > Because I can=92t point people to a handy chart with the results of yours= as > I can with Danny=92s. [*nudge* *nudge*]**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] *On > Behalf Of *Teddy Gage**** > > ** ** > > Todd, I'm hurt. How could you neglect my own awesome AE GPU benchmark > thread and project? > > ;) > > http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Todd Kopriva wrote:*= * > ** > > To be clear, I was just answering between the two choices given, not > recommending the GTX 770 over all other cards. I will not answer broad > questions like that. I will just point you to Danny Princz=92s benchmark = test > results for After Effects and Harm Millaard=92s benchmark test results fo= r > Premiere Pro, as I do here:**** > > http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520**** > > ** ** > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7bd76dba8eb84004e5059489 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Todd Kopriva <kopriva@adobe.com> wrote:

Because I can=92t point people to a handy ch= art with the results of yours as I can with Danny=92s. [*nudge* *nudge*]=

= =A0

<= /u>=A0

From:= After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Teddy Gage

=A0

Todd, I'm hurt. How could you neglect my own awesome AE GPU be= nchmark thread and project?

;)

http://forums.creativecow.ne= t/thread/2/1019120

=A0=

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Tod= d Kopriva <kopriv= a@adobe.com> wrote:

To be clear, I = was just answering between the two choices given, not recommending the GTX = 770 over all other cards. I will not answer broad questions like that. I wi= ll just point you to Danny Princz=92s benchmark test results for After Effe= cts and Harm Millaard=92s benchmark test results for Premiere Pro, as I do = here:

http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520

=

=A0




--
Animator & Editor<= br style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--047d7bd76dba8eb84004e5059489--