Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: [AE] stupid time-lapse tricks
From: George Loch <george@motoxpress.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-5196372@media-motion.tv>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:42:50 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C97173FB-FAD5-4909-9246-1B560D7AA47A@motoxpress.com>
References: <list-5196372@media-motion.tv>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>

The only way you could fake this is to start with long stedicam shots, =
perhaps export an image sequence and throw away every Nth frame to get =
the stuttery feel? Seems like just doing it the same way he did would be =
the most effective.

-gl


On Aug 31, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Jim Curtis <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote:

> http://vimeo.com/46106624
>=20
>=20
> A client sent me this link, and said it was shot with a still camera, =
and he called it a "walking time-lapse."  He wants to do something =
similar.
>=20
> I'm wondering how the film maker got all the images to register in =
succession.  Seems like you could do this manually in Ae, which would =
take forever, unless=85 there's some software that automates the =
process.
>=20
> Is anybody aware of such software? =20
>=20
>=20
> ??
>=20
> Jim
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> .
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>