Return-Path: <sureal@charter.net>
Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP id 5211033 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 20:18:12 +0200
Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta11.charter.net
          (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP
          id <20130914183109.YYGV6169.mta11.charter.net@imp10>
          for <ae-list@media-motion.tv>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:31:09 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.16] ([66.215.90.127])
	by imp10 with smtp.charter.net
	id R6X71m00B2krwcJ056X8xs; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:31:09 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=brYUnzmi c=1 sm=1
 a=DLIyoRXhys9G3DL5n+qGgw==:17 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10
 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=Fc_9lk2E_lMA:10 a=C_P_jL7n79qoI4EEOMIA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=DLIyoRXhys9G3DL5n+qGgw==:117
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: [AE] codecs etc
From: Jonathan <sureal@charter.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-5211031@media-motion.tv>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:31:06 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FD06076-6397-4517-A223-9AB4F46121DA@charter.net>
References: <list-5211031@media-motion.tv>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)

I see your point. An SSD, however, should have trouble with the data =
rate =96 yes?


On Sep 14, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Jim Curtis wrote:

>=20
> On Sep 14, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Jonathan <sureal@charter.net> wrote:
>=20
>> It was my impression that ProRes took less CPU power to encode and =
decode.
>=20
> True, but at a higher data rate and sustained disk io than a more =
compressed codec.  The challenge is finding the sweet spot between =
beauty and speed.
>=20
>=20
> .
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>