Return-Path: Received: from smarthost1.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.11] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5227782 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:09:20 +0200 Received: from [82.111.138.178] (port=39242 helo=AKAEXCHANGE.StudioAKA.local) by smarthost1.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VOm2F-0007Af-Ji for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:09:31 +0100 From: Fabrice Altman To: After Effects Mail List Subject: RE: [AE] CC Team Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:09:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A5764956E6C9404A8EF1503D6015247408018220AKAEXCHANGEStud_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WatchGuard-Spam-Score: 0, clean X-WatchGuard-Mail-Client-IP: X-WatchGuard-Mail-From: fabrice@studioaka.co.uk --_000_A5764956E6C9404A8EF1503D6015247408018220AKAEXCHANGEStud_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-WatchGuard-AntiVirus: part scanned. clean action=allow Based on nothing else but presumptions, Adobe's core revenue comes from sma= ll organisations (1 to 10 seats). From this perspective, attaching a cloud enabled software's license to an e= mail kind of makes sense. However, they do have an Enterprise solution for large organisations (minim= um 100 seats I believe) where licenses are not linked to e-mails. But when you're in the middle (10-99 seats), you're not having fun... I also wish CC for Teams would have another licensing option than e-mail (a= floating license server maybe?? yeah right), but for the time being, email= aliases are your friend. Have a look at Gmail's facility for ex : ae.user@gmail.com can be aliased with ae.user+machinename@gmail.com. Best, F. From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Curtis Nichols Sent: 24 September 2013 17:46 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] CC Team Yes, I did that. The standard reply was to use the prescribed email method. Once I asked, "Why is email so important to this system?", the responder we= nt silent. Curtis Nichols PCS Production Co. Irving, TX. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Todd Kopriva > wrote: Here's a more effective place for such feedback: http://forums.adobe.com/community/creative_cloud The Adobe folks on the AE-List are members of the After Effects team, not m= embers of the group that can usefully respond to feedback about Creative Cl= oud Team. From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Curtis Nichols Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2013 08:19 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: [AE] CC Team Really? There is no way to activate Team Members without an active email ad= dress? I need to activate two rooms/computers beyond the two that I've already act= ivated with my own email address. These aren't people - they are rooms - facilities. What a sucky system, Ad= obe. Curtis Nichols PCS Production Co. Irving, TX. --_000_A5764956E6C9404A8EF1503D6015247408018220AKAEXCHANGEStud_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-WatchGuard-AntiVirus: part scanned. clean action=allow

Based on nothing else but= presumptions, Adobe’s core revenue comes from small organisations (1= to 10 seats).

From this perspective, at= taching a cloud enabled software’s license to an email kind of makes = sense.

However, they do have an = Enterprise solution for large organisations (minimum 100 seats I believe) w= here licenses are not linked to e-mails.

But when you’re in = the middle (10-99 seats), you’re not having fun…

I also wish CC for Teams = would have another licensing option than e-mail (a floating license server = maybe?? yeah right), but for the time being, email aliases are your friend.

Have a look at Gmail̵= 7;s facility for ex : ae.user@gmail.com can be aliased w= ith ae.user+machinename@gmail.com.

 <= /p>

Best,

F.

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.= tv] On Behalf Of Curtis Nichols
Sent: 24 September 2013 17:46
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] CC Team

 

Yes, I did that. The standard reply was to use the p= rescribed email method.
Once I asked, "Why is email so important to this system?", the re= sponder went silent.


Curtis Nichols

PCS Production Co.

Irving, TX.

 

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Todd Kopriva <<= a href=3D"mailto:kopriva@adobe.com" target=3D"_blank">kopriva@adobe.com= > wrote:

Here’s a more effe= ctive place for such feedback:

http://forums.adobe.com/community/creativ= e_cloud

 

The Adobe folks on the AE-List are members of= the After Effects team, not members of the group that can usefully respond= to feedback about Creative Cloud Team.

 

 

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Curtis Nichols
Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2013 08:19
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: [AE] CC Team<= /p>

 

Really? There is no way to activate Team Memb= ers without an active email address?

I need to activate two rooms/computers beyond= the two that I've already activated with my own email address.<= /span>

These aren't people - they are rooms - facili= ties.  What a sucky system, Adobe.


Curtis Nichols

PCS Production Co.

Irving, TX.

 

--_000_A5764956E6C9404A8EF1503D6015247408018220AKAEXCHANGEStud_--