Based on nothing else but presumptions, Adobe’s core revenue comes from small organisations (1 to 10 seats).
From this perspective, attaching a cloud enabled software’s license to an email kind of makes sense.
However, they do have an Enterprise solution for large organisations (minimum 100 seats I believe) where licenses are not linked to e-mails.
But when you’re in the middle (10-99 seats), you’re not having fun…
I also wish CC for Teams would have another licensing option than e-mail (a floating license server maybe?? yeah right), but for the time being, email aliases
are your friend.
From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv]
On Behalf Of Curtis Nichols Sent: 24 September 2013 17:46
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] CC Team
Yes, I did that. The standard reply was to use the prescribed email method.
Once I asked, "Why is email so important to this system?", the responder went silent.
Curtis Nichols
PCS Production Co.
Irving, TX.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Todd Kopriva <kopriva@adobe.com> wrote:
The Adobe folks on the AE-List are members of the After Effects team, not members of the group that can usefully respond to feedback about Creative Cloud Team.
From: After
Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv]
On Behalf Of Curtis Nichols Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2013 08:19 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: [AE] CC Team
Really? There is no way to activate Team Members without an active email address?
I need to activate two rooms/computers beyond the two that I've already activated with my own email address.
These aren't people - they are rooms - facilities. What a sucky system, Adobe.