Return-Path: Received: from p3plwbeout04-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.227] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5236061 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 03:58:15 +0200 Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.245]) by p3plwbeout04-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id Xdyc1m0025JG3DC01dycTF; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:37 -0700 X-SID: Xdyc1m0025JG3DC01 Received: (qmail 30525 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2013 01:58:36 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 142.129.187.88 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.43 Message-Id: <20130930185835.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.0c9b0d7c34.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] SD to HD Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:35 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Brian, I had some color-correction invoked on the AE layer -- here is a=0As= ide-by-side with the correction disabled.=0A=0Ahttp://24.media.tumblr.com/b= 3d83f28aeb8d9ce69d115445361795c/tumblr_mtyw1qDU8I1rwwgico1_500.png=0A=0ARob= ert W. Walker=0ALos Angeles=0A=0ASTUDIO DIRECT: 323-878-0500=0ATV/FILM OFFI= CE: 323-469-6800=0A=0Arobertwwalkervo.com=0Awalkerfitzgibbon.com=0A=0AREPRE= SENTATION: Dean Panaro, Abrams Artists Agency - Los Angeles (310)=0A859-06= 25=0AMANAGEMENT: Celia Siegel, Celia Siegel Management - (612) 920-4000=0A= =0Arobertwwalkervo.com=0Awalkerfitzgibbon.com=0A=0A> -------- Original Mess= age --------=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] SD to HD=0A> From: Brian Maffitt =0A> Date: Mon, September 30, 2013 9:53 pm=0A> To: "After= Effects Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> I'm as dismayed= by the difference in color between these two examples as I am by the artif= acts.=0A> =0A> > Here is a screen grab of the SD footage scaled 176%, Pr on= the left, AE=0A> > on the right. Note the difference in anti-aliasing alo= ng the edge of=0A> > the brim of his hat.=0A> > =0A> > http://25.media.tumb= lr.com/42b7fbfd9a2d162770a0cd339a4475f8/tumblr_mtyuyieYWu1rwwgico1_500.png= =0A> > =0A> > =0A> > =0A> >> -------- Original Message --------=0A> >> Subj= ect: Re: [AE] SD to HD=0A> >> From: Jim Curtis =0A> >> Dat= e: Mon, September 30, 2013 8:40 pm=0A> >> To: "After Effects Mail List" =0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> How does the bicubic upscalin= g in Ae compare to the upscaling in Pr with CUDA? I'm in the same boat nee= ding to upscale SD.=0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> On Sep 30, 2013, at 7:23= PM, Todd Kopriva wrote:=0A> >> =0A> >>> Have you tried= the bicubic resampling new in After Effects CC (12.0), which is already ou= t? That compares favorably with Instant HD.=0A> >>> http://bit.ly/AE_bicubi= c=0A> >>> =0A> >>> Regarding the even more improved scaling in After Effect= s CC (12.1), the Detail-preserving Upscale effect: That will be available i= n mid October.=0A> >>> http://adobe.ly/1eujl3s=0A> >>> =0A> >>> =0A> >>>> -= ----Original Message-----=0A> >>>> =0A> >>>> Just my luck. I have to resur= rect some old SD commercial footage and=0A> >>>> among other things make it= HD. I know AE CC's imminent update is=0A> >>>> supposed to have a vastly = improved scaling feature - question is, does=0A> >>>> anyone know WHEN the = update is releasing? I have a deadline.=0A> >>>> =0A> >>>> If the update i= s going to be too late for this job, what is the=0A> >>>> consensus on the = next best alternative? Instant HD?=0A> >>> =0A> >>> =0A> >>> +---End of me= ssage---+=0A> >>> To unsubscribe send any message to =0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> +---End of message---+=0A> >> To unsubscribe= send any message to =0A> > =0A> > +---End of = message---+=0A> > To unsubscribe send any message to =0A> =0A> =0A> +---End of message---+=0A> To unsubscribe send any me= ssage to