Return-Path: <toddkopriva@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 5236159 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 05:50:53 +0200
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e14so12611169iej.34
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=bGnhJ2UVkN1U0hjN1etycGt/JZhXtVoGgCX14IsMJDw=;
        b=P98AJaJhkNmS1wn1AjG8mXyFvK9kVzKYRq2QFPa/GQV99vr4IjSB6bYU8byuoA6sO6
         EHbcOiad/kSGB18y1lVfUsj6VZfy3ic9klCHA5MEoupxOOKSiv5sqnngEXWmqOFXkYxr
         8Kj0T81nl1kgilNCuZeGjAJ5bWN2KH1hZSfqJYy1bjdkm3A0BzSNCen8pk4wfQ1q+aLV
         1sMpw0JYggTP9AUZR/xqJH8t/p/rwJPXcreIxlIji7LyTyUcLa3cvrSroppz189ILi3Z
         D6UBobhyzPYFhVGOg2NNH3HIoYIX8a1Cn/UZX4x5p4VO0AYKt1PEep3plRBXtz+uEK47
         t1aQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.7.101 with SMTP id i5mr16304838iga.48.1380599475221; Mon,
 30 Sep 2013 20:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.210.18 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-5236010@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-5236010@media-motion.tv>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:51:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CABsSiUy_D2gqJtEFmn9ZfJCexjODkGPQzd=XRDw9upz019A3qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] SD to HD
From: Todd Kopriva <toddkopriva@gmail.com>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111d5e44c3ee304e7a5dd34

--089e0111d5e44c3ee304e7a5dd34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

That's good feedback.

If you remember to do the same test with the Detail-preserving Upscale when
After Effects CC (12.1) comes out in a couple of weeks, let us know how it
goes.


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Robert W. Walker
<robertw@walkersound.com>wrote:

> I just did a quick test and Pr looks significantly better than AE CC,
> both bicubic and bilinear, in the anti-aliasing department.  I'm scaling
> 176%.
>
>

--089e0111d5e44c3ee304e7a5dd34
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>That&#39;s good feedback.<br><br></div>If you remembe=
r to do the same test with the Detail-preserving Upscale when After Effects=
 CC (12.1) comes out in a couple of weeks, let us know how it goes.<br><br>
<div><div><br>On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Robert W. Walker <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:robertw@walkersound.com" target=3D"_blank">r=
obertw@walkersound.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I just did a quick test and Pr looks signifi=
cantly better than AE CC,<br>
both bicubic and bilinear, in the anti-aliasing department. =A0I&#39;m scal=
ing<br>
176%.<br>
<br></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div>

--089e0111d5e44c3ee304e7a5dd34--