Return-Path: Received: from mail1.g1.pair.com ([66.39.3.162] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5236196 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:19:04 +0200 Received: from [10.0.1.8] (c-174-61-151-92.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [174.61.151.92]) by mail1.g1.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F02F22B262 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:19:24 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: [AE] SD to HD From: David Simons In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:19:18 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6DE1E2D2-1CCE-41F3-AA03-D15FBEC83590@cosa.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) In AE you're looking at one field interpolated to be a progressive frame = (since comps never show multiple fields). In PPro you may be set to see = both fields interlaced (click on the wrench icon to switch it). Either way might be a good estimate of your result (assuming the footage = is interpreted correctly), depending on whether you're planning to = output interlaced or not. I'd expect the bicubic upscaling to be visually equivalent between AE & = PPro. I think PPro only does bicubic when using the GPU. -DaveS On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Robert W. Walker = wrote: > Brian, I had some color-correction invoked on the AE layer -- here is = a > side-by-side with the correction disabled. >=20 > = http://24.media.tumblr.com/b3d83f28aeb8d9ce69d115445361795c/tumblr_mtyw1qD= U8I1rwwgico1_500.png