Return-Path: Received: from p3plwbeout04-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.226] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5236800 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:11:31 +0200 Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.243]) by p3plwbeout04-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id XqBr1m0025FgiYg01qBrG6; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:11:52 -0700 X-SID: XqBr1m0025FgiYg01 Received: (qmail 32584 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2013 14:11:51 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 142.129.187.88 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.43 Message-Id: <20131001071150.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.530829300c.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] SD to HD Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:11:50 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 The footage was shot interlaced, lower-field first - which is the way I=0Ai= nterpreted footage in AE.=0A=0A> -------- Original Message --------=0A> Sub= ject: Re: [AE] SD to HD=0A> From: Todd Kopriva =0A> = Date: Mon, September 30, 2013 11:53 pm=0A> To: "After Effects Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> Now that I look at the image, my firs= t thought is this: Are you separating=0A> fields? That looks like bad inter= lacing artifacts that come from not=0A> separating fields before scaling.=