Return-Path: Received: from na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.207] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5244774 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 23:40:42 +0200 Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob112.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUlR7/ewZ0QjOuAdw/1crBt66Lc9J8Sts@postini.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:41:20 PDT Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ar20so21286275iec.32 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:41:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JAFuXi9noeomjx9MHxjWLmjOpSOfgnNtOD+9p/rz4/Q=; b=cAx4tfxnX7iBnXSEfH3VbazlSTTH+yOc13BmuQHVLbRmRDC8vWFuivquk1d3+rBdZR AiXkHdOYxW4zdleooCdDibhNIALjHCZLlGioCUJ9RRaCNg/BgIkipI90+FRqgyNrcNDJ UCqeyLb1pnSOboDye4nQOS5CNuxlOKM9mHDuBb10Tu5mubKb+RFboctNOHgd0fVD1x14 9doBVOPYoVwn9WYhmqd0wBOxTJQ5Cudy5KQOWe+7YTBcEnuoQ84xsdbYsKgSYI2ksv21 wOD4D8rGLDx+offJ3Usq0QyJ2PBCW4GZy2//z13nypXX1qpqmVSbqdRLh1grtDXbYQdJ t+dA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCqXmDRGKpLVLI84MjNWKtsLFMfpAL6R7UTw9TcqFwnsZlnDTPbgZXRBq3t71xElqnQkuy MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.35.228 with SMTP id l4mr15449986igj.46.1381268477606; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.133.133 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:41:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:41:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT]: format for 8640x1920 clip for video wall? From: Tim Loomis - NOAA Affiliate To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135e68af297f404e841a0bf --001a1135e68af297f404e841a0bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Even H.265 will max at 8192. Aren't they driving the monitors separately? Send them 8 HD movies and they'll time them with 4 dual graphics boards like most of the OTS solutions. Some of the clients I've worked with just want large images and let their software split it up, so you could make the movie and just split the audio and video and post frames, PNGs, for them. Do you know what system they're going to project with? On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:31 PM, scott.aelist wrote: > A client is asking me to deliver a video for video wall made up of 8 HD > panels oriented vertically. [][][][][][][][] > They don't seem to know much about delivery specs, but they think they > want a 8640x1920. Is this common? I want to send them a test file but I > can't even get h264 to do that resolution (i believe it maxes out at > 4096?). > --001a1135e68af297f404e841a0bf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Even H.265 will max at 8192. Aren't they driving the m= onitors separately? Send them 8 HD movies and they'll time them with 4 = dual graphics boards like most of the OTS solutions. Some of the clients I&= #39;ve worked with just want large images and let their software split it u= p, so you could make the movie and just split the audio and video and post = frames, PNGs, for them. Do you know what system they're going to projec= t with?


On Tue, Oct 8= , 2013 at 5:31 PM, scott.aelist <scott.aelist@gmail.com> wrote:
A client is asking me = to deliver a video for video wall made up of 8 HD panels oriented verticall= y. [][][][][][][][]
They don't seem to know much about delivery specs, but they think= they want a 8640x1920. Is this common? I want to send them a test file but= I can't even get h264 to do that resolution (i believe it maxes out at= 4096?).

--001a1135e68af297f404e841a0bf--