Return-Path: Received: from st11p01mm-asmtp003.mac.com ([17.172.204.238] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5244973 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 05:15:05 +0200 Received: from st11p01mm-spool002.mac.com ([17.172.204.247]) by st11p01mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTP id <0MUD00JO5T25ZG80@st11p01mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:15:43 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-09_01:2013-10-08,2013-10-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1310080172 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_oMZbbciPxayW22HSW4Xkrg)" Received: from localhost ([17.172.204.222]) by st11p01mm-spool002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTP id <0MUD003BST25JA10@st11p01mm-spool002.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:15:41 +0000 (GMT) To: After Effects Mail List From: Warren Heaton Subject: Re: [AE] [OT]: format for 8640x1920 clip for video wall? Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 03:15:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Mailer: iCloud Mail (1S) X-Originating-IP: [99.127.114.254] Message-id: <38ae07fd-79c0-4861-9285-f119c3f55b45@me.com> In-reply-to: --Boundary_(ID_oMZbbciPxayW22HSW4Xkrg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Animate in your 8640x1920 comp and render that out a proxy movie at Quarte= r Resolution (2160x480) for design reviews. =A0I usually use Photo-JPEG at= 75%. =A0If they'd really like H264 for viewing, nest the 8640x1920 comp i= nto a 1920x1080 comp, scale the nested comp to fit the containing comp wid= th (it'll letterbox _a lot_) and then render that for design review.=0A=0A= When you're ready to deliver the eight full HD panels, nest the 8640x1920 = comp into eight 1920x1080 comps, rotate and adjust the Anchor Point or the= Position such that each of the containing comps shows only one of the eig= ht panels each. =A0Render the eight 1920x1080 containing comps for deliver= y to the projectionist.=0A=0AThe delivery settings will depend on the proj= ection system (I've done Blu-ray, HD-DVD, H264 for HD systems and widescre= en DVD for SD systems).=0A=0A=0A=0A-Warren=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ASent from iClo= ud=0A=0AOn Oct 08, 2013, at 07:52 PM, Tim Thiessen = wrote:=0A=0Awhen ever I've done things like this they use separate HD file= s - I worked on a piece for Cisco Lobby on 7 HD screens, they were able to= synced those 7 files - A trick that I learned from that project was to re= nder once with 7 different output modules (with different crop settings) t= hey had been rendering each movie out 7 times for each screen, which would= have been fine except they had over 20 different videos to render. So the= y when from 140 renders to 20 renders.=0A=0ATim T=0A=0AOn Oct 8, 2013, at = 2:31 PM, scott.aelist wrote:=0A=0AA client is asking me to deliver a video= for video wall made up of 8 HD panels oriented vertically. [][][][][][][]= []=0AThey don't seem to know much about delivery specs, but they think the= y want a 8640x1920. Is this common? I want to send them a test file but I = can't even get h264 to do that resolution (i believe it maxes out at 4096?= ).=0A=0A=0A+---End of message---+=0ATo unsubscribe send any message to =0A= --Boundary_(ID_oMZbbciPxayW22HSW4Xkrg) Content-type: multipart/related; boundary="Boundary_(ID_sH/IjcnLi3n2TAbrPbIO4Q)"; type="text/html" --Boundary_(ID_sH/IjcnLi3n2TAbrPbIO4Q) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Animate in your 8640x1920 comp and render that out a proxy movie at Q= uarter Resolution (2160x480) for design reviews.  I usually use Photo= -JPEG at 75%.  If they'd really like H264 for viewing, nest the 8640x= 1920 comp into a 1920x1080 comp, scale the nested comp to fit the containi= ng comp width (it'll letterbox _a lot_) and then render that for design re= view.

When you're ready to deliver the eight full= HD panels, nest the 8640x1920 comp into eight 1920x1080 comps, rotate and= adjust the Anchor Point or the Position such that each of the containing = comps shows only one of the eight panels each.  Render the eight 1920= x1080 containing comps for delivery to the projectionist.

The delivery settings will depend on the projection system (I've = done Blu-ray, HD-DVD, H264 for HD systems and widescreen DVD for SD system= s).



-Warren





<= div>
Sen=
t from iCloud

On Oct 08, 2013, at 07:52 PM, Tim Thiess= en <pixelbot@comcast.net> wrote:

when ever I've don= e things like this they use separate HD files - I worked on a piece for Ci= sco Lobby on 7 HD screens, they were able to synced those 7 files - A tric= k that I learned from that project was to render once with 7 different out= put modules (with different crop settings) they had been rendering each mo= vie out 7 times for each screen, which would have been fine except they ha= d over 20 different videos to render. So they when from 140 renders to 20 = renders.

Tim T

On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:31 PM, scott.aelist = wrote:

A cli= ent is asking me to deliver a video for video wall made up of 8 HD panels = oriented vertically. [][][][][][][][]
They don't seem to know much about delivery = specs, but they think they want a 8640x1920. Is this common? I want to sen= d them a test file but I can't even get h264 to do that resolution (i beli= eve it maxes out at 4096?).


+---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-lis= t-off@media-motion.tv>
= --Boundary_(ID_sH/IjcnLi3n2TAbrPbIO4Q)-- --Boundary_(ID_oMZbbciPxayW22HSW4Xkrg)--