Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5245287 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:01:06 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id at1so1316325iec.2 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 04:01:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=eZjlDjF3gTTr3RhpBZOrr2AMUlJ1mC/cwTYI/HcqwL4=; b=OoML+nC8SF22PVJa2ly49CoCiLWPjBEKVTE4K3T8ieSQHPc/PY5X/1SbQlNECwCDve 44sfeWKbBEiHD+OjywBJUcOTqeBgh1a0e9qHmeuB1BAkLLCjjcOmki2cF9BL6h+dr6bD hRVVB3GQzdl4GiiTdkBenns/P4Tl34bddKMu0RtQ5HKiIaNY3Rz+Pzl2djBl2On3JtJG UBv38aQkI6KYSG4PMk5jkqvqzk04tAV3BQ2FxxnzmhYZeTSvyOS+f0iewXkQKaxFA0DL FmplILv7W+ZlmL96VDw+ycmQUmL959PIQIcayk1v6hKaKJxPBAlLyAFgipugOnR9c7Xh QIFw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOJJU658IvObJ74Ky6oouk4dhXCtnsssaORQvKMpXqR2T2uU9J4iIxE2fBNpwAOZMAAs+j X-Received: by 10.51.16.3 with SMTP id fs3mr1414109igd.53.1381316503927; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 04:01:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.61.199 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:01:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Walter Soyka Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 07:01:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT]: format for 8640x1920 clip for video wall? To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134cf1c8a15b404e84ccfba --001a1134cf1c8a15b404e84ccfba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 As the others mentioned, delivery specs are driven by the playback system -- you need to talk with someone actually engineering the playback to know for sure what to deliver. Anything here would just be a guess. I'll add that depending on the physical configuration of the screens, you may need to work wider than 8640 to accommodate for the width of display bezels or negative space between panels. *Walter Soyka* | Keen Live Email walter@keenlive.com On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:31 PM, scott.aelist wrote: > A client is asking me to deliver a video for video wall made up of 8 HD > panels oriented vertically. [][][][][][][][] > They don't seem to know much about delivery specs, but they think they > want a 8640x1920. Is this common? I want to send them a test file but I > can't even get h264 to do that resolution (i believe it maxes out at > 4096?). > --001a1134cf1c8a15b404e84ccfba Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As the others mentioned, delivery specs are driven by the = playback system -- you need to talk with someone actually engineering the p= layback to know for sure what to deliver. Anything here would just be a gue= ss.

I'll add that depending on the physical configuration of= the screens, you may need to work wider than 8640 to accommodate for the w= idth of display bezels or negative space between panels.

Walter Soyka =A0| =A0Keen Live
= Email=A0walter@keenlive.com



On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:31 PM, scott.ae= list <scott.aelist@gmail.com> wrote:
A client is asking me to deliver a video for video wa= ll made up of 8 HD panels oriented vertically. [][][][][][][][]
Th= ey don't seem to know much about delivery specs, but they think they wa= nt a 8640x1920. Is this common? I want to send them a test file but I can&#= 39;t even get h264 to do that resolution (i believe it maxes out at 4096?).=

--001a1134cf1c8a15b404e84ccfba--