Return-Path: Received: from exprod6og122.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.238] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5249898 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:21:44 +0200 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob122.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUlhP8ju/1uFSE2Us2jfWlZDhlKZr6cOg@postini.com; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:22:28 PDT Received: from inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.52]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r9BJIkiH008836 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r9BJMPOU005780 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:22:25 -0700 From: Todd Kopriva To: After Effects Mail List Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:22:23 -0700 Subject: RE: [AE] Levels vs Curves render times Thread-Topic: [AE] Levels vs Curves render times Thread-Index: Ac5vs/6dr91LWdpHRuGC4RDK88JB5RXAthyQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 re-awakening a dormant thread: If we were to spend time improving the Curves effect, what would be the cha= nges that you'd want to see? Be as specific as possible, and list things in= your priority order. Anything in the Curves effect is fair game for this c= onversation, including user interface, performance (as noted by Chris below= ), and additional features. > -----Original Message----- > From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf = Of > Chris Zwar > Sent: Saturday, 22 June 2013 18:50 > To: After Effects Mail List > Subject: [AE] Levels vs Curves render times >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I was surprised by something a work colleague encountered this week. I > didn't see the project, but I believe it was quite long, with many layers= of > video in it. > When he initially went to render it it looked like being a 48 hour render= (this > is after the render has been going for several hours). This was too long= , and > he guessed that the many instances of the curves plugin were slowing > everything down. He stopped the render and went through the project and > replaced all the curves plugins with levels instead, to get the same effe= ct. > Then the entire project rendered in about 2 hours. > That's a massive difference in speed - this is AE v5, so not something af= fected > by cache. > I can understand that curves may be slightly slower to render than levels= - > but I would never have expected such a massive difference. And my > colleague is something of an AE guru and said he had experienced this > before, and that he's always found curves to be a slow plugin to render. = I'd > never really noticed... > Any thoughts?