Return-Path: Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com ([17.158.232.237] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5263028 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:08:34 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (rrcs-108-178-156-44.west.biz.rr.com [108.178.156.44]) by nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MV500ELN6W3L520@nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:09:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-23_04:2013-10-23,2013-10-23,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1310230104 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\)) Subject: Re: [AE] 29.97 versus 23.976 for corporate? From: rik bogusz In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:09:38 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <1A9C4234-B2C8-49B6-9184-82F8F94FB813@mac.com> References: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816) ugh. i just went through a similar experience for a spot for broadcast = that was about equal with footage shot on set, combined with animations = and motion graphics. the dp insisted on shooting 23.976 with the same = "filmic" justification. for spots, corporate/industrial and online = 23.976 just creates more problems and will give you a massive migraine.=20= On Oct 23, 2013, at 3:03 PM, James Culbertson = wrote: > I work for one company that has always done its corporate work = (primarily for the web) at 29.97 progressive. They have just brought in = a new DP who is religious about using 23.976. I'm not that attached one = way or the other except that I find that certain kinds of motion = graphics (particularly text) look smoother at 29.97. I'm curious what = others standardize on in the corporate sphere when going to the web? >=20 > I've always found the notion of using 23.976 for "filmic" effect = overrated outside of feature narrative/documentary sphere when compared = to DOF, color, and things like story. Particularly when most consumers = don't notice the difference in my experience. >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > James >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to