| ||||||||||
| I agree with the folks who MUCH prefer 23.976 when they have to integrate 3D renders. I will say nearly anything to convince a client that "24 just LOOKS better" (giggle). That said... I just finished a TNT series where all assets were requested to be 23.976. And I didn't even lobby for that. ... For what it's worth... -Lachlan Westfall Quiet Earth Design On 10/23/13 3:03 PM, "James Culbertson" <albion@speakeasy.net> wrote: > I work for one company that has always done its corporate work (primarily for > the web) at 29.97 progressive. They have just brought in a new DP who is > religious about using 23.976. I'm not that attached one way or the other > except that I find that certain kinds of motion graphics (particularly text) > look smoother at 29.97. I'm curious what others standardize on in the > corporate sphere when going to the web? > > I've always found the notion of using 23.976 for "filmic" effect overrated > outside of feature narrative/documentary sphere when compared to DOF, color, > and things like story. Particularly when most consumers don't notice the > difference in my experience. > > Thoughts? > > James > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
