Return-Path: Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.24] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5263300 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:51:02 +0200 Received: from omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id grGJ1m0030EPchoA2rs92N; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:52:09 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.3] ([98.245.64.53]) by omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id grs71m00C18wLSA8Mrs8Bl; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:52:08 +0000 From: David Baud Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8F01E85B-06F5-4560-8F6F-C03FF3D10449" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: [AE] [AE] 29.97 versus 23.976 for corporate? Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:52:07 -0600 References: To: "After Effects Mail List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1382586729; bh=xEZ/n2pDwehrc6ZHxO+4hJCjf2dKvDOAq9JklQ5aNY4=; h=Received:Received:From:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version: Subject:Date:To; b=Oafp69pOfst6NsXS3G6pSgu6ddoM+8M1dA1kK0hO7r0+4VEUEaR06/598RbghztfE tFX7gnXrPtc3iIqCuB4pPHvwaQPHikOztuD5hikTxa1R1Vwt4C4pdsiaF/95zwxKVN AjtTvF75iY1ryfYGWVI4xrSqo81cjgefN81MCG9WMobuKTa7mOG7GQnvN9PIVdZH01 Fr0S1m3/tvP5+BHGB8IIXzPcrkdEd52xbzybM7sYo0FKy41nUJl0sX4p66pE2Hqgfy ha0zDcFcnsUBP+oldRURZnzr+/w6ps5ZN0QjjO3xvU/QPRx62hELhk8XQUKz36OWf+ HwtQhOUyTKRGw== --Apple-Mail=_8F01E85B-06F5-4560-8F6F-C03FF3D10449 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To me if you have control from production to delivery (who really does? = :-), I shoot all fast action at higher frame rates (50/60, 100, 200) = with propper shutter speed, and the "static shot" at 24p. Then I choose = to deliver my master at 24p. And yes I was part of the people who did = not enjoy watching the Hobbit at 48fps: it looked like to real for my = brain, like being on a stage and watching the story developped in front = of me! So yes I believe you don't get the same response from viewer = watching 24p over 30p.=20 David Baud K O S M O S P R O D U C T i O N S david@kosmos-productions.com www.kosmos-productions.com On Oct 23, 2013, at 21:24 , Gary Reisman wrote: > Well, 24p does look more filmic and less "video", so can't really = blame people for favoring it. (and on the flip side,. seems like a lot = of people dissed Pete Jackson for going 48p on The Hobbit!) >=20 --Apple-Mail=_8F01E85B-06F5-4560-8F6F-C03FF3D10449 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii To me = if you have control from production to delivery (who really does? :-), I = shoot all fast action at higher frame rates (50/60, 100, 200) with = propper shutter speed, and the "static shot" at 24p. Then I choose to = deliver my master at 24p. And yes I was part of the people who did not = enjoy watching the Hobbit at 48fps: it looked like to real for my brain, = like being on a stage and watching the story developped in front of me! = So yes I believe you don't get the same response from viewer watching = 24p over 30p.

David Baud

K O S M O S P R O = D U C T i O N = S

<= /span>

david@kosmos-productions.com<= /a>

www.kosmos-productions.com<= /span>

On Oct 23, 2013, at 21:24 , Gary Reisman <garyreisman@mac.com> = wrote:

Well, 24p does look more filmic and less "video", so = can't really blame people for favoring it. (and on the flip side,. = seems like a lot of people dissed Pete Jackson for going 48p on The = Hobbit!)

= --Apple-Mail=_8F01E85B-06F5-4560-8F6F-C03FF3D10449--