Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5289413 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:53:03 +0100 Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id id10so1245744vcb.19 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:55:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tn6knivLvoiN32s4jtwl8fHhSqR6ozQAFHSO9hQLu20=; b=hGdm4xaN7bR4xbehd8UDrUw0i50ONsliQ5wvFZ7CEw8d/HKTyDZonwO8fpqLExIBH9 +ARM4+BjMi0iU9tPeAhqWj62tfgJvNkXKpncYnIg41qJSM75uTE29pk7kduuZ5qO9CBa kAGoJMgmQiptjMsRO59UuXW2sdj0BIL/5Yy0M7glUgLxQxeKb5RRLulhDPphPkAtTe4F VIIo2+Lh+NihoeVbfDTOdONowdjsL4U6n7IUHewcBrPEpPKzRJWvVXBINJSzcI/4x8ce XEC3lq0pgb8Qi/aPB85oQw/eJh2fF298S2Vt8waXmvhgKVQPOOIneNdwBPitmZob/e1h B8Iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.248.197 with SMTP id yo5mr16724934vdc.0.1384847701509; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:55:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.172.98 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:55:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:55:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Non cloud backup solutions for solo freelancers? From: Py Fave To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable for your own personal cloud , you can easily setup an old machine with some linux (lubuntu ie ) , and owncloud . it's mature now and you have imho something more futureproof or freenas with a bunch of drives in zfs is a nice solution too, it can handle backups more often perhaps i'm off topic ,though 2013/11/18 Mel Matsuoka : > On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > > > Without spending thousands more for a double bay drive, we haven't found = an > easy way to create duplicate copies of the tapes. What we do now is > cumbersome. > > > > In lieu of buying an expensive tape library or auto-loader system, I use = a > form of hybrid redundancy with my LTO5 archiving workflow, where for each > set of data, I back it up to an LTO5 tape, as well as at least one bare, > zero-filled SATA drive. I even take things further by protecting the bare > drive directories using a tool like Disk Drill =93Recovery Vault" or Tech= Tool > Pro Directory Backup, so that in the in event that the directory on the > drive gets corrupted, I can still recover the original file/folder names. > > I'll then take the LTO5 tapes offsite, and leave the bare-drive archives = on > a shelf at work. I use CDFinder/NeoFinder on OSX to catalog the drive for > future searching purposes, and then put it on the shelf, using either > Wiebetech "DriveBox=94 cases or Orico PHP-35 protective boxes for individ= ual > storage. > > The bare drives not only serve as a cheap, easy way to ensure redundancy > with the LTO archive (in case either my office or house burns down, I=92m > still protected=85if both of them burn down at the same time, then I have > bigger problems than data redundancy to be concerned with), but also as a > faster-than-tape "offline near-line=94 archive that I can use if I ever n= eed > to restore an old project for revisions. Philosophically, I consider the > LTO tapes to be a backup of these individual archive drives. > > For the type of work I do, this system is a perfect balance of cost, > security and performance. > > -- > Mel Matsuoka > Finishing Editor / Colorist / Difference Splitter > > Montaj 9 > Honolulu, HI > > http://vimeo.com/montaj9 > http://instagram.com/starwipetv >