Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5298387 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:46:08 +0100 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id gq1so6638650obb.3 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:48:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vLmca8/eoya2axdZbmDOq/UIR08Jy4dQMxdiSSQlVx4=; b=DBIXnjCh5EPPKklYVh4RlkpRjYB5qWKWDc1ewKF7MnSgihKbVWjYFM3h8nGlDd/xvg zzecgu2qU2tptnecnby+DiiB9GSmLmt0y7a2rjA4+sCbTvUpTIHl+HjK25rQiFtsGdWA J7iiuHliSe9od0hq1absOy1DE2p+B41k/Uglvr9Vw0Y9Xsb+staTeHPFunIGS0juNyAl saBB8jsKjZZJRpVUpCdg6TPgOhJFtJ0e4rT5bXZk4mTd5VQRywAb5sJ8/gZWER8ju2Cj qS4DyjC2j3DmXcFx3FyudQFJGQxmwBqZ0Wfz/IF6llC5JWq/PxOnkbUgMk/GfFe0uoIB A8ag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.115.164 with SMTP id jp4mr31353910oeb.19.1385509701549; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:48:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.198.145 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:48:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:48:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] DPX color space From: Erik Hansen To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01161b4698053804ec1d1d70 --089e01161b4698053804ec1d1d70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Not sure what kind of support AME has for ARRIRAW files. You might be better off with Resolve Lite (up to UHD) or ARRI's own ARC - ARRI Raw Converter. You want to end up with a LogC image at the correct white balance and ISO -- extracted from the metadata or can be corrected in either of those tools. LUTs are built for specific parameters, I wouldn't expect just any LUT to work on something it wasn't built for. You could build a "more correct" LUT on ARRI's website, if you know the parameters on how it was created and what you need to output. But saying that, if this is just for viewing your composite and not baked in... eh... you might be fine. Erik Erik Hansen 323-316-3731 @error1k On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > I'm trying to get my color settings correct and am somewhat confused. > Here is is my setup: > > - 32Bit Ae project > - sRGB color space > - linearize working space enabled > > I exported the ARRIRAW sequence with AME to a DPX sequence. Import into AE > and it says it's in linear space in interpret footage. > > On the layer, I'm adding a LUT I got from the ARRI website that we use a > lot for S-Log clips. The file still looks washed out. But if I put a > .4545(reverse of 2.2) gamma with a levels effect, it looks like what we saw > on set. > > Does that sound right? Or am I missing or messing something up? I don't > normally work with DPX files. > --089e01161b4698053804ec1d1d70 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Not sure what kind of support AME has for ARRIRAW files. Y= ou might be better off with Resolve Lite (up to UHD) or ARRI's own ARC = - ARRI Raw Converter. You want to end up with a LogC image at the correct w= hite balance and ISO -- extracted from the metadata or can be corrected in = either of those tools.

LUTs are built for specific parameters, I wouldn't expec= t just any LUT to work on something it wasn't built for. You could buil= d a "more correct" LUT on ARRI's website, if you know the par= ameters on how it was created and what you need to output. But saying that,= if this is just for viewing your composite and not baked in... eh... you m= ight be fine.

Erik


Erik Hansen
323-316-3731
@= error1k


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Byron N= ash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm trying to get my color settings correct and am som= ewhat confused.=A0
Here is is my setup:
  • 32Bit Ae proj= ect
  • sRGB color space
  • linearize working space enabled
  • I exported the ARRIRAW sequence with AME to a DPX sequence. Import int= o AE and it says it's in linear space in interpret footage.
=

On the layer, I'm adding a LUT I got from the ARRI = website that we use a lot for S-Log clips. The file still looks washed out.= But if I put a .4545(reverse of 2.2) gamma with a levels effect, it looks = like what we saw on set.=A0

Does that sound right? Or am I missing or messing somet= hing up? I don't normally work with DPX files.

--089e01161b4698053804ec1d1d70--