Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5309325 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 03:49:20 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id to1so2754830ieb.32 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:51:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=m0Bu4aZRDV/iZ5XFramdEC4BKk8i6nHyq5nEiUlKIGU=; b=rB4AkRTvhXx27bmw3yHJxPYjFUhy3YLtZtJ3BC6r3HYTeMhap79rrcSdErDMexAuPi qVttaJkzhB7sSRVnMjL5fYa5g6hMjWWU3ewF1iJKd3oRzV1ucoRNHPhnEzzw1wRLQTSe b5Y4CLXVwR0RGMquf3sG1C/d9N39Dp3Erx5wLZd5xpuvSaosc9f5vyUGYtkto2y/F1z6 DKjGzgcKdpMTBiNcOHZ7wnFGZJnftn6qbd235TlRJI9Kmp8oLxaioPtt0ILnCxby/SCy avjK9wHBsGWl3ACo7buegxfCl1Oau58RtSbgiZFP6zFxNoshIwnpkW45xGU/ctJpwmTf gCtw== X-Received: by 10.50.154.102 with SMTP id vn6mr5645166igb.15.1386384713325; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:51:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.178.35 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:51:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 21:51:33 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Final Render Quality for a Movie To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7581e5c5a0f04ece8d8a8 --047d7bd7581e5c5a0f04ece8d8a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just to add to my question - what really drives the kbps speed? I have the various clips I mentioned previously (about 14) and they vary from like 80000kbps down to 21000kbps. However, I rendered them all at the same quality from AE. Eric On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote: > Hello - Hoping to get a quick answer here. > > I am doing a final render of a full length movie. It consists of about 14 > separate hi res clips that have bit rates ranging from 21K to 30K and when > I render the entire thing in DNxHD for some reason I'm getting poor quality. > > I'm using Premiere Pro. Any ideas on what I should do to get the very > best quality? > > Eric > > -- > *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* > *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* > *The Night Visitor | VFX* > *443.206.1347 <443.206.1347>* > > *www.kirkproductions.com > kirkproductions@gmail.com * > *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ > * > > -- *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* *The Night Visitor | VFX* *443.206.1347* *www.kirkproductions.com kirkproductions@gmail.com * *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ * --047d7bd7581e5c5a0f04ece8d8a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just to add to my question - what really drives the kbps s= peed? =A0I have the various clips I mentioned previously (about 14) and the= y vary from like 80000kbps down to 21000kbps. =A0However, I rendered them a= ll at the same quality from AE.

Eric


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk <kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello - Hoping to get a qui= ck answer here.

I am doing a final render of a full leng= th movie. =A0It consists of about 14 separate hi res clips that have bit ra= tes ranging from 21K to 30K and when I render the entire thing in DNxHD for= some reason I'm getting poor quality.

I'm using Premiere Pro. =A0Any ideas on what I shou= ld do to get the very best quality?

Eric

--
Eric D. Kirk |=A0Kirk Productions
Hidden in the Woods | VFX
The Night Vis= itor | VFX
=A0



--
Eric D. Kirk |=A0Kirk Productions
Hidd= en in the Woods | VFX
The Night Visitor | VFX
443.206.1347
=A0
--047d7bd7581e5c5a0f04ece8d8a8--