Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5309861 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:33:25 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id lx4so3602668iec.37 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 10:35:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=2vfwP+n11LxxUCP0q+egtnOH2sGkzIcTOlKaJ/EAuQI=; b=oHZYJ28M93GRt1oXc0GdEO4LX6qUsnROchznq0s9i6LZeaMY8SNa3WoyVRhD579W6c U4LDm58fDHWK1etO/mttPetHKV3MXHklM42qHIL0bDGmO1UnhGUTRCZxeFGiHeJCtZ9f H7R0sHX4xx4mJQnN8BEzELJ25l7b1PeYn6IUqVDpNnuOHlJeR3Al8pQl1wxTfji9dTWs 7FOK1W2AKI4PHD/0hq8eYAr5ICqdpX2wWhWo9QjeD/Bort8QyPkhApmmkntVQrCFqROY SEeIObh8sD6aRWf5XE1ss747cgH7EwkpFVfmYxMAxNG0+Ij+funn3KwxtV0mzCcHEt19 2ONQ== X-Received: by 10.43.170.130 with SMTP id nq2mr55484icc.69.1386441359615; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 10:35:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.178.35 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:35:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 13:35:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Final Render Quality for a Movie To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2f730bdeda804ecf60891 --001a11c2f730bdeda804ecf60891 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, if I read in to that, is it reasonable then to believe that certain clips or parts of clips will render with different bit rates and if so, is that important in the end? I'm just trying to figure out and understand that if I select the best quality settings, I am getting them regardless of what I see when I check bit rates in the rendered info for the clip. So, 1920x1080, DNxHD, quicktime wrapper, 100 quality is what I chose. I should expect the best with that, correct? Now, when I compare to original footage before my VFX was added, the areas that I see maybe hazing or something seems to coincide with the raw footage. I just don't want it blamed on me when they see something and I have to say well, it matches original and when you brighten a darkened raw shot, you will notice a bit more. Make sense? Thanks, Eric On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Py Fave wrote: > content is sometimes more easy to compress than other. > > a black frame is easy to compress for instance . > > please give all the specs: codecs , resolution, .. > > > 2013/12/7 Mr. Eric D. Kirk > >> Just to add to my question - what really drives the kbps speed? I have >> the various clips I mentioned previously (about 14) and they vary from like >> 80000kbps down to 21000kbps. However, I rendered them all at the same >> quality from AE. >> >> Eric >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk < >> kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello - Hoping to get a quick answer here. >>> >>> I am doing a final render of a full length movie. It consists of about >>> 14 separate hi res clips that have bit rates ranging from 21K to 30K and >>> when I render the entire thing in DNxHD for some reason I'm getting poor >>> quality. >>> >>> I'm using Premiere Pro. Any ideas on what I should do to get the very >>> best quality? >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> -- >>> *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* >>> *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* >>> *The Night Visitor | VFX* >>> *443.206.1347 <443.206.1347>* >>> >>> *www.kirkproductions.com >>> kirkproductions@gmail.com * >>> *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ >>> * >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* >> *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* >> *The Night Visitor | VFX* >> *443.206.1347 <443.206.1347>* >> >> *www.kirkproductions.com >> kirkproductions@gmail.com >> * >> *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ >> * >> >> > > -- *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* *The Night Visitor | VFX* *443.206.1347* *www.kirkproductions.com kirkproductions@gmail.com * *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ * --001a11c2f730bdeda804ecf60891 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So, if I read in to that, is it reasonable then to believe= that certain clips or parts of clips will render with different bit rates = and if so, is that important in the end? =A0I'm just trying to figure o= ut and understand that if I select the best quality settings, I am getting = them regardless of what I see when I check bit rates in the rendered info f= or the clip.

So, 1920x1080, DNxHD, quicktime wrapper, 100 quality is what= I chose. =A0I should expect the best with that, correct?

Now, when I compare to original footage before my VFX was added, th= e areas that I see maybe hazing or something seems to coincide with the raw= footage. =A0I just don't want it blamed on me when they see something = and I have to say well, it matches original and when you brighten a darkene= d raw shot, you will notice a bit more.

Make sense?

Thanks,
Eric


On S= at, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Py Fave <pyfave@gmail.com> wrote:=
content is someti= mes more easy to compress than other.

a black frame is easy to= compress for instance .

please give all the specs:=A0 codecs , resolution, ..


2013/12/7 Mr. Eric D. Kirk <kir= kproductions@gmail.com>
Just to add to my question - what really drives the kbps s= peed? =A0I have the various clips I mentioned previously (about 14) and the= y vary from like 80000kbps down to 21000kbps. =A0However, I rendered them a= ll at the same quality from AE.

Eric


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:03 PM, M= r. Eric D. Kirk <kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello - Hoping to get a qui= ck answer here.

I am doing a final render of a full leng= th movie. =A0It consists of about 14 separate hi res clips that have bit ra= tes ranging from 21K to 30K and when I render the entire thing in DNxHD for= some reason I'm getting poor quality.

I'm using Premiere Pro. =A0Any ideas on what I shou= ld do to get the very best quality?

Eric

--
Eric D. Kirk |=A0Kirk Productions
Hidden in the Woods | VFX
The Night Vis= itor | VFX
=A0



--
E= ric D. Kirk |=A0Kirk Productions
Hidden in the Wood= s | VFX
The Night Visitor | VFX
=A0




--
Eric D. Kirk |=A0Kirk Productions
Hidd= en in the Woods | VFX
The Night Visitor | VFX
443.206.1347
=A0
--001a11c2f730bdeda804ecf60891--