Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5319493 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 04:38:42 +0100 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hq4so3118759wib.15 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:41:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=S5PW0YfB9hKGt4zLm6OChILTBsf6NFaTPr95pRGdhjw=; b=hxN6MhjM4gz4Ll/TeLBEyiTslPQaUx1vMN970qgBdG7CO64DrK2IabVsEvjb+RvfhQ jUvBSnlMbrCWMbrXUGbNA5Yfe7XU/Mz70rdKKQubE0/5yeXgAeFJ0dNMuSOvnshBKjq/ wfQPMUE6zlwThHy7ol9h5Mg9WQi0BrEr+jIiTH9lJy0Lc0rDsCCiVWshQiGG5uv45Ggt Qk1oF0cicWq5acQtsrNMuuvpT89x/WnyfpjGqqQf+lZJGwMmYaIq9tx+KW8vBkkRAIDZ h2qsQ9jdKGbaqxMu8JPXYndBDabSTrsEeXoCv8W8cFKuuZjKtSjFQPHhPe4vXu9Da2KQ qUyA== X-Received: by 10.194.175.133 with SMTP id ca5mr16806820wjc.19.1387251696203; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:41:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hedczech@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.189.201 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:40:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "scott.aelist" Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:40:55 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FkWHqEobBC6ET08IIqCaMxD91NM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] OT: WebM and Theora plug-ins for Premiere To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493c5a90fbb604edb2b44e --089e01493c5a90fbb604edb2b44e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Well, they also work in Media Encoder Well that's pretty cool. I haven't investigated these formats much. Do you find they have advantages over h264 (other than being open source?) Do you get better quality or smaller file-sizes? On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Brendan Bolles wrote: > On Dec 16, 2013, at 2:40 PM, scott.aelist wrote: > > > This is Premiere-only, yes? > > > > > Well, they also work in Media Encoder, so you could render an AE project > out that way and use WebM, similar to how Adobe recommends you render H.264. > > And actually, I think the import side will be supported by AE, although I > haven't tested that a whole lot. > > AE-native plug-ins could be made if there was a good reason and demand. > > > Brendan > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > --089e01493c5a90fbb604edb2b44e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>=A0Well, they also work in Media Encoder

Well that's pretty co= ol. I haven't investigated these formats much. Do you find they have ad= vantages over h264 (other than being open source?) Do you get better qualit= y or smaller file-sizes?


On Mon,= Dec 16, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Brendan Bolles <brendan@fnordware.com>= ; wrote:
On Dec 16, 2013, at 2:40 PM, scott.aelist wr= ote:

> This is Premiere-only, yes?
>


Well, they also work in Media Encoder, so you could render an AE project ou= t that way and use WebM, similar to how Adobe recommends you render H.264.<= br>
And actually, I think the import side will be supported by AE, although I h= aven't tested that a whole lot.

AE-native plug-ins could be made if there was a good reason and demand.


Brendan
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--089e01493c5a90fbb604edb2b44e--