Return-Path: Received: from [64.29.147.237] (HELO mail24c25-2209.carrierzone.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5326008 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 23:07:49 +0100 X-Authenticated-User: albion.speakeasy.net Received: from [192.168.1.125] (c-67-185-28-214.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.185.28.214]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail24c25-2209.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id rBLMAlxq015699 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:10:49 +0000 From: James Culbertson Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA975840-324A-4DEC-AB68-4F10A42EB486" Subject: Re: [AE] (OT) New Mac Pro - Who's getting it? Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:10:20 -0800 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=aKDJ99Nm c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Y/MgaaCAW/y6DJCnCmasCA==:117 a=Y/MgaaCAW/y6DJCnCmasCA==:17 a=C_IRinGWAAAA:8 a=g0qM3YM6AAAA:8 a=sj8xHyxJ8GQA:10 a=A8LQOh1NFgIA:10 a=eVbW6KzvAAAA:8 a=tVlM9X-CyKQA:10 a=76MnKq--AAAA:8 a=CNQR0VI_AAAA:8 a=dMyDFYSfmaa7UxL9MiEA:9 a=zPd1iU-OqgWUtw7F:21 a=tOo92OhcKtY8uIAu:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=_5XVCEB0b_IA:10 a=_fs7A1O_YSQkJ6cSYZEA:9 a=Sv9ar2Zk6J2DXRUN:21 a=-m7KpjnEjP_RBDUo:21 a=2NC_H4nq2T_-ZUna:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.52B611E9.007C,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 --Apple-Mail=_CA975840-324A-4DEC-AB68-4F10A42EB486 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I'm looking at buying a 6 core base processor, 512GB SSD, 32GB RAM, and = dual D700s (and AppleCare) for about $5500 + tax. Thunderbolt = peripherals extra of course. =46rom what I can see an equivalent cost workstation PC isn't all that = different. Building one yourself is cheaper I assume but that's still = not really worth the time based on my hourly/daily rate. Then there is the cost of equivalent GPUs on the PC side. As I = understand it a D700 is pretty equivalent to a W9000 at over $3000/GPU. = But even the D300 is a pretty good deal. Someone correct me if I am = wrong here. In any case, if there is a couple of hundred dollar premium (GPUs aside) = for having what I personally consider a superior system (knowing full = well that what each of us considers a superior system varies immensely) = and I can pay for it on average with about 2 weeks of work... well, = what's the debate really about? James On Dec 20, 2013, at 12:11 PM, S=F8ren Christensen wrote: >=20 > I was trying to configure a HP Z workstation and a Boxx workstation = with the same specs (cpu, gfx card etc)as the new mac pro. > They ticked in between 38-51% more expensive than a new mac pro. With = normal sata6 ssdnand with smaller category gfx cards (And off course = pcie slots). > With one gfx card they where still expensiverl... > I find it quite odd that people are ranting about how expensive the = mac is maxed out when pc counterparts cost the same or a lot more for = the same configuration. >=20 > In my case the mac pro comes as a blessing and the form factor is very = welcome. I do a lot of live visuals and virtual scenography where gpu = performance and multiple (more than 3) outputs is a must. And super fast = ssd speeds to handle xx amounts of realtime hd video layers a necessity. = This small wine-cooler-look-a-like design (Bodum, anyone?) fits in the = hand luggage. Touring with mac pros has become fun again :-) >=20 > Looking forward to see some real world cpu and gpu tests. What has = been clear for a long time is that gpu power is the new 'black'. Lets = hope that the all-in bet on opencl pays off. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > S=F8ren >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > >=20 >=20 > |||| DESILENCE STUDIO > |||| www.dslnc.com - motion & interactivity > |||| +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) >=20 > |||| SOCIAL > |||| twitter.dslnc.com facebook.dslnc.com >=20 > |||| SHOWREEL 2013 > |||| v5.dslnc.com/reel/ >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 20 Dec 2013, at 20:20, dennis@reelsolutions.com wrote: >=20 >>> You say "Not interested in starting any mac vs. pc debate..." Then=20= >>> "I imagine they are mainly for rich nerds to show off?" ... Ok... >>=20 >> Count me in as a rich nerd I guess - I'll be buying one. I've never = regretted buying a Mac, when I've gotten a bad one (1 in 16+years, = they've been great at correcting the problem). >>=20 >> I've made a couple PC purchases I'd rather not go into...=20 >>=20 >> Why make an assumption how long it will take to get repaired? I had a = MacPro way out of warranty that had a power supply go bad; I guess they = didn't have the part because they gave me a brand new base model MacPro = for no charge at all, they didn't even charge for the diagnostic fee. = (And they let me pay the difference to upgrade it to the fastest = MacPro). What a waste of money! >> This was for a 4+ yr old machine, they weren't obligated to do = anything. Time to receive the new machine was about a week ( mainly = because I requested a non-stocked configuration). >>=20 >> HP wants $3,749 for the 12 core Xeon chip, they're not cheap. >>=20 >> 800.00 to upgrade from a 256GB SSD isn't bad considering it will do = 1200 MB/s. To match that speed, you can't really replicate it easily = (RAID adds latency). >>=20 >> mho... Dennis Wilkins >=20 --Apple-Mail=_CA975840-324A-4DEC-AB68-4F10A42EB486 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1  a 6 core = base processor, 512GB = SSD, 32GB RAM, and dual D700s (and AppleCare) for about $5500 + tax. = Thunderbolt peripherals extra of = course.

=46rom what = I can see an equivalent cost workstation PC isn't all that different. = Building one yourself is cheaper I assume but that's still not really = worth the time based on my hourly/daily = rate.

Then there = is the cost of equivalent GPUs on the PC side. As I understand it a D700 = is pretty equivalent to a W9000 at over $3000/GPU. But even the D300 is = a pretty good deal. Someone correct me if I am wrong = here.

In any = case, if there is a couple of hundred dollar premium (GPUs aside) for = having what I personally consider a superior system (knowing full well = that what each of us considers a superior system varies immensely) and I = can pay for it on average with about 2 weeks of work... well, what's the = debate really about?

James<= /span>


On Dec 20, 2013, at 12:11 PM, S=F8ren = Christensen wrote:


I was trying to configure a HP Z = workstation and a Boxx workstation with the same specs (cpu, gfx card = etc)as the new mac pro.
They ticked in between 38-51% more = expensive than a new mac pro. With normal sata6 ssdnand  with = smaller category gfx cards (And off course pcie slots).
With = one gfx card they where still expensiverl...
I find it quite = odd that people are ranting about how expensive the mac is maxed out = when pc counterparts cost the same or a lot more for the same = configuration.

In my case the mac pro comes as = a blessing and the form factor is very welcome. I do a lot of live = visuals and virtual scenography where gpu performance and multiple (more = than 3) outputs is a must. And super fast ssd speeds to handle xx = amounts of realtime hd video layers a necessity. This small = wine-cooler-look-a-like  design (Bodum, anyone?) fits in the hand = luggage. Touring with mac pros has become fun again = :-)

Looking forward to see some real world cpu = and gpu tests. What has been clear for a long time is that gpu power is = the new 'black'. Lets hope that the all-in bet on opencl pays = off.


Cheers,
S=F8ren






<dslnc_email2_black.png>


|||| DESILENCE STUDIO
||||  www.dslnc.com - motion & = interactivity
||||  +34 93 268 = 0953  /  +34 61 555 9963 (mobile)

|||| SOCIAL
|||| = twitter.dslnc.com  facebook.dslnc.com

|||| SHOWREEL = 2013



On 20 Dec 2013, at 20:20, dennis@reelsolutions.com = wrote:

You say "Not interested in starting any mac vs. pc debate..." = Then 
"I imagine they are mainly for rich nerds to show off?" = ... Ok...

Count me in as a rich nerd I guess - I'll be = buying one. I've never regretted buying a Mac, when I've gotten a bad = one (1 in 16+years, they've been great at correcting the = problem).

I've made a couple PC purchases I'd = rather not go into... 

Why make an = assumption how long it will take to get repaired? I had a MacPro way out = of warranty that had a power supply go bad; I guess they didn't have the = part because they gave me a brand new base model MacPro for no charge at = all, they didn't even charge for the diagnostic fee. (And they let me = pay the difference to upgrade it to the fastest MacPro). What a waste of = money!
This was for a 4+ yr old machine, they weren't = obligated to do anything. Time to receive the new machine was about a = week ( mainly because I requested a non-stocked = configuration).

HP wants $3,749 for the 12 core = Xeon chip, they're not cheap.

800.00 to = upgrade from a 256GB SSD isn't bad considering it will do 1200 MB/s. To = match that speed, you can't really replicate it easily (RAID adds = latency).

mho... Dennis = Wilkins


= --Apple-Mail=_CA975840-324A-4DEC-AB68-4F10A42EB486--