Teddy, has anyone ever told you that you wobble on the line between speaking your mind and being a bully?

There's certainly room for talking about the pros and cons, but you pretty regularly get aggressive and negative. Take a deep breath. 

You've often got really valuable things to say, but you need to check your tone. It can be pretty off putting.

Brian Behm

On Saturday, December 21, 2013, Teddy Gage wrote:

     James, you can do whatever you want, but don't misrepresent the facts. A custom PC with similar render numbers on many benchmarks than your new mac pro will actually run you closer to $1,200-1,500. You could literally buy three hex-core computers for the price of that single mac pro. In terms of render power, that's a far cry from "a couple hundred dollars" difference. Yes the Pro has many bespoke custom parts. But they are more or less matched to 90% by regular high end PC components. For example nobody "needs" ECC RAM at 200% markup or Xeon-class chips at 300% markup. Regular DDR4 RAM and i7 chips are just as good, if not faster, in many cases. 

     You don't have to build it yourself, and you don't have to buy it from Dell or HP, who also charge a hefty markup closer to Apple's, which is where a lot of these inaccurate numbers are coming from. There are tons of mid-level workstation builders out there with great reliability and good warranties. Your justification is fine, I'm not here to tell you how to spend your money. But your comparison is simply not accurate if you understand computer hardware and benchmarks. 

On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, James Culbertson <albion@speakeasy.net> wrote:

I'm looking at buying a 6 core base processor, 512GB SSD, 32GB RAM, and dual D700s (and AppleCare) for about $5500 + tax. Thunderbolt peripherals extra of course.

From what I can see an equivalent cost workstation PC isn't all that different. Building one yourself is cheaper I assume but that's still not really worth the time based on my hourly/daily rate.

Then there is the cost of equivalent GPUs on the PC side. As I understand it a D700 is pretty equivalent to a W9000 at over $3000/GPU. But even the D300 is a pretty good deal. Someone correct me if I am wrong here.

In any case, if there is a couple of hundred dollar premium (GPUs aside) for having what I personally consider a superior system (knowing full well that what each of us considers a superior system varies immensely) and I can pay for it on average with about 2 weeks of work... well, what's the debate really about?

James

On Dec 20, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Søren Christensen wrote:

I was trying to configure a HP Z workstation and a Boxx workstation with the same specs (cpu, gfx card etc)as the new mac pro.

They ticked in between 38-51% more expensive than a new mac pro. With normal sata6 ssdnand  with smaller category gfx cards (And off course pcie slots).

With one gfx card they where still expensiverl...

I find it quite odd that people are ranting about how expensive the mac is maxed out when pc counterparts cost the same or a lot more for the same configuration.

In my case the mac pro comes as a blessing and the form factor is very welcome. I do a lot of live visuals and virtual scenography where gpu performance and multiple (more than 3) outputs is a must. And super fast ssd speeds to handle xx amounts of realtime hd video layers a necessity. This small wine-cooler-look-a-like  design (Bodum, anyone?) fits in the hand luggage. Touring with mac pros has become fun again :-)

Looking forward to see some real world cpu and gpu tests. What has been clear for a long time is that gpu power is the new 'black'. Lets hope that the all-in bet on opencl pays off.

Cheers,

Søren

<dslnc_email2_black.png>

|||| DESILENCE STUDIO

||||  www.dslnc.com - motion & interactivity

||||  +34 93 268 0953  /  +34 61 555 9963 (mobile)

|||| SOCIAL

|||

--

_____________________________

VFX & Motion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com

--
not getting enough of my blather?
check out http://flabbyironman.blogspot.com
or my portfolio at http://behmcreative.com